The United Nations, born out of the need for nations of the world to communicate and bring about peace and understanding, has, in the past six decades, acted in such a manner as to affect the opposite result and should, therefore, change its name and headquarter’s location. I would suggest the new name be The United Nations Against Human Rights and its headquarters be moved to, say Tehran, or Beijing, both being appropriate.

In 1948, the charter members adopted the the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. A declararation of lofty ideals and promises aimed at meeting those ideals, insuring basic, God given liberties for all the world’s population. But in the sixty years since, the UN and a minority of oppressive, terroristic countries have succeeded in cajoling their way into the majority of most of the meaningful and effective commissions and councils making up the bulk of the UN’s ruling body. The declaration of 1948 seemed to be a call to action for those who would see the world oppressed rather than free.You could designate 1948 as the pinnacle of the UN’s ability to affect change for the better.

Take, for example, the attitude of the UN General Assembly toward the nation it founded as one of its first official actions, Israel. Since 1948 the UN’s various councils and commissions have sanctured Israel for violations of human rights, UN policies, and other crimes nine times more than all other nations for all other reasons combined, while all representations of the Palestinians and other agressors, be it the PLO, PA, Hamas, Hezbolah, etc, have been sanctioned only eight times and mentioned only less than ten. According to the UN, all violence and strife in the middle east, on whatever side, is directly attributable to Israel and her Zionist schedule of world subversion. Another telling tale of the UN’s march toward global, dictatorial domination is its general acceptance and approval of rule changes making it not only possible, but likely that nations rated as "not free" by Freedom House, an international NGO UN watchdog, are nominated and elected into positions of authority on commissions whose very purpose is to monitor, report on , and seek to change the inhumane actions against their population. It’s as if the proverbial fox had been elected Chairman of the Board to Assure the Safety of Chickens and Roosters of the World. The replacing of the original Commission on Human Rights with the new Human Rights Council has done no more than to encourage and expedite the actions of countries among the worst of human rights abusers. Granted, the CHR had become corrupt, ineffective, and a vehicle to legitimize the actions of offending nations, the newly chartered HRC promises to follow in the footsteps of it predecessor and to quicken the pace of actions toward global tyranny. One method to that end is the promotion in status of a group over an ideal. The basic premise of human rights is that no person or group of people can subjugate the rights of humanity given to them by right of birth. Giving recognition and authority to the Organization of Islamic Councils, a group of people, the UN has sanctioned the OIC’s proposal and passing of an anti-religious defamation resolution which, on its face, prohibits hate speech directed toward those of a religious faith, but in actuality specifically prohibits the terms Islam, Jihad, and Muslim being used in conjunction with the terms terrorist, radical, fascist, extremist, or other such verbage. The resolution goes as far as stating, "the freedom of speech may be limited out of respect for religious freedom". Whose religious freedom is being protected here?

Another blatant attempt at world domination is LOST, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea which would annex the portion of the Earth covered by ocean as territory under the authority of the UN. It would abolish all territorial limits and assume command of all commercial, private, and military vessels operating therein. In essence, it would secede US command of our naval and commercial fleets to the UN and the Security Council for whatever purposes they deem proper. The United States has refused to sign into, ratify, or take part in the creation or operation of any such resolutions. The one exception being the UNCERD (explained below), signed by L. B. Johnson in 1964, and ratified by the senate in 1994, at the behest of then President Clinton.

These major deviations from the intent and purpose of the UN and its original charter have come about due, majorily, to the adoption, in defiance of the US and other free nations, two resolutions and the abuse and misuse of these by countries known for human rights atrocities. The UNCERD, the UN Commisission on Reduction of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and UNHRC, the UN Human Rights Council, whose names espouse promises of good, decent, universal actions for mankind, have not only veered exceedingly from their stated purpose and their title’s promises, but have become a forum for the vilainization of Israel and the demasculation of the US and its allies.

The Heritage Foundation and UNWatch describe, much better than I, the actions and results of the UN leadership, its councils and comissions, and the "rogue" nations that are benefiaries and the major cause of human rights violations and inequalitieas between member nations of today’s world. At least interesting, and at most, alarming, these, and other publications of Heritage Foundation and UNWatch, amplify the message and intent of the title of this writing, a lowly attempt to sound an alarm, "The UN’s War On Unity, Israel, and the USA".

Glenn Flowers