Posted by
Glenn Flowers on Monday, July 27, 2009 9:16:19 PM
Dis crim i nate v, 1. To make a clear distinction; distinguish; differentiate
--American Heritage Dictionary
The word, discriminate, has come to be known as synonomous with racial prejudice or racial bias. While it could mean those in certain contexts, its true definition is far less evil, and is, actually, complimentary when used to describe one’s ability to think and analyze in a critical fashion. Discriminating is the act or description of the act of clearly defining a subject.
While the title of this piece uses both the accepted but incorrectly applied definition and the actual meaning of the word, it does describe the manner in which the liberal lives his life and makes value judgements. This ingrown corruption of thought and lack of a need to define right and wrong is both arbitrary (indiscriminate) and judgemental (discriminatory) according to their own set of values. And what, pray tell, are their values? That making a judgement as to the rightness or wrongness of anything is wrong. They refuse to discriminate in the manner that comes natural to normal, properly educated humans of adult age.
There is a book, the author’s name escapes me, whose title explains the mindset of all liberals, All I Ever Needed To Know I Learned In Kindergarten. In that formative and pliable period of childhood a great many basic principles are learned and, in most cases, those principles are fleshed out and refined with additional knowledge and years of experience. The liberal mind, though, learns "Don’t hit" and in later years the basic premise of "don’t hit" remains. They never learn that it might be necessary and the correct thing to do to defend one’s self or one’s nation against aggression. They also learn, during that period of childhood, that to judge something or someone as good or evil, right or wrong, is not a good thing to do, as one may have a reason for acting in what might appear to be a wrong way. To judge is wrong, have an open mind to all opinions, do not discriminate. This lesson is primarily the product of elite academians attempting to teach a "better way". It ends up a disaster for the child and the population in which he is to live his life.
Why would anyone seek to instill this mutated outlook on life into the minds of children? Because all the governments and religions, all the kings, emperors, and presidents throughout history have failed to bring about a total end to man’s suffering. No one has ever, through their judgement of right and wrong, attained a utopia. So, what else is there except indiscriminate, non-judgemental beliefs to try instead? So, they discriminate indiscriminately. In other words, they judge without determining the right or wrong, they just oppose any judgement and replace it with their opposition to that judgement.
The vast majority of humans learn early in their lives, without even being taught as much, that there are differences in right and wrong, good and evil, and the natural ability of the human mind to discriminate between the two leads most to the same conclusions as to what is right or good, and what is wrong or evil. Fully 90% of all humans would agree as to the distinguishing characteristics between those opposites. But not the child indoctrinated to be indiscriminate.
In the attempt to never be judgemental they must accept evil as being the same as good and in doing so, they must see any judgement or discrimination as bad. To be labeled as a good thing means that the bad thing had to have been cheated out of its right to be judged on an equal basis. To be a bad thing the good had to have been unjustly determined as good to the detriment of the thing judged as bad. The result of this indiscriminate discrimination is the liberal necessity to always support the opposite of whatever is judged as good or as bad by those self righteous, know it all self worshippers.
In judging the nation of Israel to be a decent, peace and freedom loving nation of tolerant Jews, the liberal sees it his duty to take the opposite approach and find all the fault he can to negate the positive and intelligent judgement of Israel as a good nation. In the patriotism and national pride Americans show for their nation, the liberal’s indiscriminate discrimination demands the defining of all admiration for America to be self serving conceit and arrogance. Whatever a thing is found to be, right or wrong, the liberal must oppose it to maintain their philosophy of equality of being.
The notion that Sadam Hussein was an evil dictator who murdered and tortured his own people leads to a liberal defining him as a strong leader who held his country together despite worldwide condemnation and persecution. Likewise, the belief that the United Nations panders to evil dictators and tyrants and embezzles the contributions of member nations demands a liberal judgement that the UN is the only force fighting for global equality and the dignity of all people.
To keep from being judgemental they, instead, indiscriminately discriminate. You can’t fairly define them as evil because they seek to do good in their misguided ways. They can’t be labeled as stupid either because their personal lives show the ability to work and generally be a productive member of society. So what causes their backwards philosophy of judging good versus evil? Brainwashing. Early childhood indoctrination into a world where no judgement is the right judgement. This being the goal of those whose intention is to subjugate the masses under a boot heel of tyranny. It is the mindset of the Orwellian proletariat. Irrationality is their strategy, the lack of critical thought their goal. It is only success at rendering the masses incapable of such discriminatory thinking that will insure the total domination of them. Besides, it is a lot less complicated to just oppose any semblence of rational judgement. It takes less effort to just see everything and everyone as equal in their essence.
It is a surrender of one’s own individuality that is as debilitating as a frontal lobotomy. To become a walking, talking Chatty Cathy doll is the ultimategoal of the well indoctrinated liberal. "Let the really smart people do all the hard work," is their mantra.
So, while we can feel sympathy for those zombies that comprise the majority of the moderate and democratic population, we can not become like them or let them influence the discriminating minds among us. To do so is, well, all too apparent in our present situation. Obama is the product of indiscriminate discrimination. After all, he is one of them.