While listening to C-Span’s coverage of the Senate debates on healthcare reform, I learned quite a bit about what they are proposing for America. The most disturbing factor is that every person in America will be required to purchase healthcare insurance. It won’t be up to you as to whether or not you want or can afford health care insurance, it will be the law. By the way, you can take all the president’s promises and throw them out the window because they aren’t true, none of them. Abortion will be covered under the Planned Parenthood clause. Illegal immigrants will be covered because the bill doesn’t allow any hospital to turn away anyone requiring treatment.

During the debate one republican senator spoke out saying that, as far as he could tell, the average cost of insurance today was approximately $2200 for an individual, $14,000 for a family. He then stated that, if his math was correct, the mandatory policy that eveyone must buy if this reform bill passes will cost $9000 for an individual, and $33,000 for a family. Most policies now in effect cover 80% of the total cost and the patient covers 20%. The new, more expensive policy that the proposed reform bill mandates covers only 65% and the patient pays the 35% balance. When a senator spoke out in objection to the higher cost and lower coverage, reminding the committee that the purpose of reform was to provide lower cost and cover 100% of the population, the only response from the committee was that they could lower the cost by lowering the percentage of coverage to 50%.

I watched these debates for three days and never once was there any suggestion that the reform initiative be abandoned, no suggestion to reform the malpractice industry, no suggestion for allowing insurance sales across state lines, nothing constructive, only destruction. Not once was a suggestion or complaint by a republican even taken seriously. The committee did make quite a deal about not having any legislative language to work with, as the bill has not been written. What they are working with is a 250 page list or outline of the general aspects of a bill that will only be written if passed by the House and the Senate. This is the same as giving Congress a blank check.

Folks, America is in a deep mess if either this or any health care reform bill or the Cap and Tax bill passes. If both become law, you will not recognize America any longer. Your pay will be dictated by Washington, your children’s future will not be theirs to pursue. Washington will put controls on your heater and air conditioner allowing them to set how warm or cool your house will be. Washington will design all automobiles, aircraft, trains, and everything else that uses energy. The food you eat, what you drink, what you drive, when and where you vacation, where you live, where you work, whether you belong to a union, whether you own a computer, what is available online, what your children learn, what they wear, how many children you have, everything will be mandated by the government because of these two bills and their requirements.

If ever there was a time demanding action by citizens it is now. We need to triple whatever effort we have put forth in the past. It is a hard thing for democrats in congress to vote down two of the president’s signature pieces of legislation, we must make it even harder to vote for them. Once in place, these laws would have a profound effect on the nation that would be near impossible to reverse.

Sent to me by a really long time friend who is, for all practical purposes, a political illiterate. He votes democratic because his parents did. He refused to say where he got this.

Cancallation of the F-22 project, cancellation of the ABM Anti-Ballistic Missile project, a declared policy of ending development of future nuclear technology, a declared policy of unilateral nuclear disarmament, publicly announcing to the world that we are not at war with Islam even though Islam has declared war upon western civilization. All of these are actions already taken by the Obama administration. There are many more actions that have given comfort to our enemies, apologizing to the world for the actions America has taken in the past.

Ignoring treaties and promises made to allies, supporting dictatorial regimes over democratic nations, bowing to Arab royalty and snubbing English prime ministers. Refusing to act to rescue American citizens held hostage when we literally had the kidnappers in our sights. The lack of an ability to act assertively and in defense of America.

This super-soft attitude and its corresponding actions have served our known, self-declared enemies well and have made the USA more vulnerable than we were on December 6, 1941, or September 10, 2001. This attitude has been adopted for the purpose of, supposedly, eliminating America as a threat to our enemies in the hope that that will eliminate the animosities they hold towards us. To put Americans in that type of danger on the whim of an inexperienced, America hating, self-proclaimed radical, is a crime against the USA, the Constitution, the oath of office of the President, and, most terribly, against the people of America.

Obama is purposely following an agenda of making America as or more vulnerable than those who have threatened us hoping that they will reconsider their hostility because of our vulnerability. He has also made criminal the actions of those tasked with preventing attacks on America. He has conferred rights of American citizens upon captured enemy fighters giving them their day in US civilian courts instead of being tried by military tribunals. He has released classified photos of US undercover operatives to the defense attorneys of these prisoners, who have then showed the photos to every prisoner so that they can identify who it was that interrogated them. This action is illegal and serves to blow the cover of our agents in the field and endanger their lives.

Currently, our nation spends less than 4% of our gross domestic production on defense. That includes research, active duty personnel, equipment procurement including ships and aircraft, and fuel for that equipment. All must be had with less than 4%, one twenty-fifth of our nation’s yearly wealth. Isn’t defense the number one reason for this government’s existence? Shouldn’t we be calculating actual cost for the defense against known threats and allocating that instead of limiting it to 4%? Obama has declared that our defense spending is too high to pay. He intends to lower our defense budget to 3% or less in the next ten years.

It is time we, the People, shout as loudly against these dangerous and destructive policies as we have against health care reform, cap and trade, and the superfluous spending bill.

If we do not, no amount of tax or spending cuts, no economic or political victory will be enjoyed when the nation is defeated by its enemies.

No Russian spy, no enemy interloper, no act of treason by the worst traitor in history has served to render Americans as vulnerable to enemy attack as the policies of the current president. Yet there are no demands for any investigations except against Bush and Cheney, there are no charges of treason or high crimes, except against our CIA, and there are no brave men standing up for the rights of Americans, except those in uniform.

America is no longer the hope of the democracies of the world, these nations have no hope any longer other than that no enemy takes advantage of them. How likely is that scanario?

Historians can relate the consequences of a nation choosing to cower in fear of their enemies as opposed to those who have invested in national defense and are contantly vigilant, acting from a position of strength.

Our nation’s existence and its security, unrivaled by any nation in history, has come at a very dear, dear price. Thousands of young Americans have dedicated their lives and deaths to this nation and her people, knowing that if left to the enemies and their will, America would soon cease to be the nation she is, and her people would live under tyranny. To disregard that investment of young lives on a notion is criminal and should not be allowed when avenues are available to prevent it.

God, please help the USA.

Glenn Flowers

It’s tough to tell, sometimes, when someone is lying to you. In fact, most can’t tell the difference in truth or lie. A better way to judege between opposing tales is to consider the source. If someone has lied before, they’ll most likely lie again. The opposite is also true. If you have found someone whose word has always been solid, it is, usually, a sign of character and honesty.

When opposing stories are of a very complicated topic, such as the proposed healthcare reform bill released in August, to discern that which is factual requires a good deal of reading and thought, and most people will end up siding with whomever they feel most attached to instead.

Take for instance the claim that illegal immigrants will not be covered under the bill. The Republican representitives almost to a person will argue all day, even call the president a liar because of what they’ve read in the bill. Yet the president vehemently denies that illegals will be covered. But, anyone reading the bill objectively will see that both are, to some extent, correct in their claims.

But, on page 762, line 1 says ‘‘(A) provides services to beneficiaries under this title without discrimination on the ground of race, color, national origin, creed, source of payment, status as a beneficiary under this title, or any other ground unrelated to such beneficiary’s need for the services or the availability of the needed services in the hospital;" You need to, again, back up one page to 761 to learn that that statement above is just one requirement for a hospital to be certified under the bill. The entire, undivided sentence is, "No hospital may be defined or deemed as a disproportionate share hospital, or as an essential access hospital (for purposes of subsection (f)(6)(A)(iv), under a State plan under this title or subsection (b) of this section (including any waiver under section 1115) unless the hospital provides services to beneficiaries under this title without discrimination on the ground of race, color, national origin, creed, source of payment, status as a beneficiary under this title, or any other ground unrelated to such beneficiary’s need for the services or the availability of the needed services in the hospital;"

Any hospital not defined as an essential care hospital will not be paid for essential care services. So, to be a real hospital, you can not turn away anyone, even illegal aliens. But, illegals are not eligible to become a covered member of the plan. So, they will remain in the status they are in today. To get treatment, they must use the emergrncy room.

They are not "covered" by the plan as that is defined as being enrolled. Obama is right, they are not "covered". But, they will continue to be treated, free of charge, in the emergency room and can not be turned away. Obama’s critics are also right, the illegals will receive healthcare, free, under the terms of this bill.

Who, then, is more honest in their claim? It is the one who is using the exact phraseology of the bill to promote an idea that is not a part of the bill. The people do not want illegals treated in their tax paid hospitals anymore than is needed to save their lives. To that, the president says, "Illegal immigrants will not be covered under this bill." Great, they will be turned away for all but life threatening reasons. Right? "Uhhhh, that’s not what I uhhhh… let me make it perfectly clear, again."

And he’s lied to us before, by ommision and commission. We should know by now. The same kind of "rigg-a-ma-roll" can be shown with regards to the so-called "death panels". This topic has nothing to do with the End of Life Counciling, though, it has everything to do with the Comparitive Efficiency Studies and the requirement in the bill to lower healthcare costs.

The true nature and effect of this bill will not be known until the Secretary of Health and Human Services creates the studies, rules, and guidelines that the Secretary is tasked, by the bill, to create. The Comparitive Effectiveness Study is mandated to provide a set of guidelines for treatments that are more effective (read cost effective) than others. This set of guidelines will be the rules that the "death panels" will go by to determine who will receive what treatment, based upon their ability to contribute to society, not on how dire their need for the treatment is.

So, Obama is correct when he says there will be no death panels pulling the plug on Grandma because those exact terms are never used. But, they are there, in effect. So, the opposition is telling the truth about the intent of the bill.

"I never heard Reverend Wright preach a sermon like that. He always preached about Jesus Christ and loving your neighbor."

"I never worked for ACORN, was never their attorney, never trained their crews, and have not been associated with them in any way."

Oh, the list is WAY too long to type out. But, I think you see my point. He’s lied everyday, everyway, since being coronated. He can not be trusted to do the right thing, only the "Wright" thing.

Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the methods used by the CIA in interrogating prisoners captured in Iraq and determine if the interrogators should be criminally charged and tried for their actions. But it won’t end there because the end result they seek is nothing less than the prosecution of George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, their legal advisors, and the CIA interrogators by an international tribunal in Spain for crimes against humanity.

When Obama was inaugurated, Eric Holder was in Spain acting as an advisory counsel in proceedings before the tribunal. He was contacted by Obama’s advisors and asked if he would be willing to participate in the gathering of evidence against US government officials to be provided to that international tribunal. Holder agreed to the request and returned to the states and was apponted attorney general.

The evidence, documents released by the CIA, is sufficient to acquit all involved in any court or military tribunal held in the US. But due to more restrictive definitions of torture and broader, less defined international criminal laws, those same documents would, most likely, be enough to convict all those involved if used by that tribunal in action against them.

Why does Obama and Holder want Bush administration and CIA officials prosecuted?

1. It would endear them to the transnationalists with whom they share core beliefs, and
2. Obama’s extreme leftist supporters were promised this if they helped win the election. You just can’t ignore that kind of sincere, loyal dedication, now can you.
3. What liberal Deficrat wouldn’t want this to happen to Bushitler and Darth Vader?

Following the advice of a trusted, fellow blogger, I have decided, for at least the near future, to concentrate my critique of the present members of the federal government to the actual stupidity and miscalculations, and consequences of their decisions, and, for at least the near future, forgo any mention of what I believe to be their underlying motives. I do this in an attempt to, possibly, convince those who would otherwise brand or have already branded we Conservatives as conspiracy nutts for offering outrageous motivational theories, that regardless of motivation the outcome is disastrous. Having my best friend, a former devout Conservative and war veteran, tell me he believes none of what I proved to him, I must admit there are those who voted for this inept manchild candidate who won’t ever admit that they could have and should have known what Obama was beforehand. It is just too demeaning.

So, BLOGGERS! Do not attempt this at home, this was performed by an experienced blogger with nothing left to fear!

This new methodology will take the style of a new, separate blog named,

a standard line by Sgt. Joe Friday of original DRAGNET fame (for members of the X and Me generations and those in Rio Linda, CA).

Glenn Flowers

PS: I have no dreams of actually changing the minds of any hardcore, leftist Deficrats. I am not insane nor do I have illusions of grandeur. Well, not serious ones, anyway.

All the Obama supporters are saying that we need to discuss health care reform in a constructive, bipartisan, cooperative manner. Well, I’m willing to give it a go. I’ve read the bill and believe it allows doctors to "pull the plug on Granny". You folks say it doesn’t. Here is your chance to teach a conservative what you know.

It is these five questions about Sect 1233. ADVANCED CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION. Pages 424-434, that make us conservatives believe in the possibility that Granny could have her plug pulled. Prove to us that this bill doesn’t allow it.

1. Can you show me where the bill prevents a doctor from issuing and signing an "order for life sustaining treatment" that denies treatment to a patient?
2. Where in Sect 1233, or anywhere in the bill, does it say that the wishes of the patient, on the order for life sustaining treatment, must be carried out in all cases?
3. What kind of legal barriers need to be addressed in a state, as mentioned on Page 427 paragraph (ii), sub-paragraph (I), to enable an order for life sustaining treatment?
4. Why is it that a doctor must sign the order to make it legal, but the patient isn’t required to sign?
5. What directives are available to the patient in Sect. 1866(f)(3) as mentioned on Page 430 in paragraph (iv)?
6. Why is the patient limited to those directives in Sect. 1866(f)(3)?

There are no state laws in existence anywhere preventing a doctor from saving a patient’s life. There are state laws, though, that prohibit doctors from knowingly allowing a patient to die if they can prevent it. It is my opinion, and nothing in the bill says anything different, that the state laws the bill says need to be overcome are state penal codes for murder.

If anyone can alleviate these fears, I, and many more like myself, would greatly appreciate it.

• Any proposed legislation will be posted on the internet at least five days before it is voted on so the people can read the bill and give their input.
• Earmarks, or pork, will be stopped. I will veto any bill with earmarks attached to it.
• Lobbyists will have no place in my administration or in Washington.
• All I ever heard from Rev. Wright on Sundays was about God, love, and Jesus Christ.
• When I met Bill Ayers I knew nothing about his past.
• I never had any association with ACORN.
• I knew nothing about Tony Rezko’s illegal acts.
• I am not a Muslim, I never attended a Muslim school, and I was not raised as a Muslim.
• I am not a socialist.
• I do not want to take over automobile companies. I have enough on my plate already.
• I met Michelle while we were in college.
• Our stimulus bill will keep the unemployment rate at or below 8%. It will never rise higher than 8%.
• General Motors is too big and and has too many working Americans to just let it go bankrupt.
• My administration will be the most open and transparent in history.

All of the above statements should be easily recognizable in two ways. First, they all came out of the pie hole of Barack Obama. Second, they are all lies that he knew were lies when he said them, the worst kind of lie, intentional.

And those are just off the top of my head, I’m sure there have been MANY others I am not aware of.

 So, when Obama stands in front of his beloved teleprompter, telling us about the health care bill, and says…

• there is no provision for rationed health care in the health care reform bill,
• you will be able to keep your doctor and insurance plan if you wish,
• the bill will be revenue neutral,
• it will not be government controlled, socialized medicine,
• it will not come between you and your doctor,
• it will provide coverage for everyone,
• it will only do away with the waste and fraud,
• the medical industry is so bad that something HAS to be done, that we can’t just do nothing,
• the AMA and AARP endorse the bill,

I believe I’ve discovered another unreported evil in the bill. On page 100, Sect 205(d)(1), Coverage for Certain Newborns, there is a description of how an infant, born with no approved health care, shall be, within 60 days, classified as a non-traditional Medicaid eligible individual. Sounds innocent enough. But on page 749, Section 1943(b)(1), Treatment of Certain Newborns, it says, "In the case of a child who is deemed under Sect. 205(d)(1) of this act to be a non-traditional Medicaid eligible individual and enrolled under this title pursuant to such section, the State shall provide for a determination by not later than the end of the period referred to in subparagraph (A) of such section, of the child’s eligibility for medical assistance under this title."

Overall, the bill is structured in a manner meant to hide such offensive provisions and be confusing and hard to find anything using the Table of Contents. The TOC has no page numbers, at least not in the PDF I obtained. The TOC is divided into Divisions labeled A, B, C, etc., each of those have several Titles labeled I, II, III, etc., with the numbering being restarted in each division, and each Title has Subtitles labeled A, B, C, etc.

But, the actual layout of the bill is organized by Sections beginning with 100, 101, 102, etc., subsections labeled (a), (b), (c), etc. and sub-subsections labeled (1), (2), (3), etc. Each of these sub-subsections has sub-paragraphs labeled (A), (B), (C), etc.

To reference anything such that someone else can actually find your reference you need to use, Page, Section(subsect)(sub-subsect), Subparagraph, as I did above.

Example: Page 100, Section 205 (d)(1) subparagraph A.

You can not, at least not quickly, find anything by Division, Title, and Subtitle, as these are major, very large delineations. 1018 pages with just three Divisions means thumbing through at least 300 pages to find if you are in the right Division, the one after, or the one before the one you want. And with subtitles and subparagraphs both using capital letters, and every other sub-anything using small letters, trying to find what you want on any page is sleep inducing. Things could have, should have been made simple by incorporating, uhhh, let’s see, hmmmm…. ?PAGE NUMBERS? in the Table of Contents. These guys never fail to amaze with their absolute disdain for the people. And THEY are the stupid ones, not US. I’ll show them disdain.

Anyway, this bill is everything they claim that it’s not, everything they say they don’t want, and is exactly what they say won’t or couldn’t ever pass the Senate. LIARS!!

Glenn Flowers

• Knowingly and purposefully lying to the American public regarding his true agenda and vision of America, hiding their socialist plans until elected

• Using fraud and criminal activists to gain an advantage in the 2008 election

• Acting to cover up fraud and illegal activity by his campaign and ACORN

• Accepting and seeking illegal foreign and domestic campaign contributions

• Attacking the policies and platforms of opposing candidates by spreading falsehoods about family and friends to the point of libel and slander.

• Promoting legislation to silence radio talk show hosts not in step with the administration.

• Denial of responsibility for adverse and harmful effects of their policies and, instead, falsely blaming them on the opposition and previous administrations

• The arrogant violation of the Constitution and federal law regarding spending of tax revenues on items not approved

• Bullying, in thuggish fashion, anyone speaking out or acting against their policies and actions.

• Congress meeting behind closed doors, locking out minority members.

• Passing legislation in such a hasty manner as to preclude the reading or debate of same.

• Confiscation of the future earnings of the people of America for semi-legal purposes, and distributing those funds for other, unproposed purposes

• The sequestration of a large portion of those funds in secret accounts.

• The levying on the people of taxes in excess of half of their earnings for the purpose of forcing certain lifestyles and behaviors adverse to their general well being without authority of law.

• The overtaking of private corporations and industries by governmental decree.

• The distribution of private, corporate, and public assets and wealth to trade unions, campaign supporters, and friends.

• Refusal to submit documentation of eligibility for office.

• Knowingly acting in a manner destructive to the United States and its people and economy by supporting punitive taxation

• Apologizing to nations of the world for the past actions of America not deserving of an apology.

• Lying to the people regarding the true effects of his health care reform bill on the care the people will receive, their choice of plans and providers, rationing and elimination of health care to the elderly, and access by the government to citizens’ bank accounts.

• Actively pursuing policies designed to remake America into a fascist socialism akin to the teaching of Vladamir Lenin and Saul Alinsky.

• Acting in a racially divisive and biased manner in all incidents succeptible to racial differences and biases.

• Appointing unelected, unconfirmed "czars" to positions having both legislative and executive powers, constituting a separate and unresponsible, all powerful fourth branch of government.

• Appointment of believers and supporters of eugenics, forced abortion, transnationalism, global government, junk science, etc. to positions described as czars above.

• Funding, with tax revenues, self proclaimed, violent enemies of America publicly announcing their intent to overthrow the government of America and institute a system of religious persecution.

• Acting to train and prepare illegal campaign organizations in methods and tactics of defrauding voter registration activities.

• Admitting, in his own words, to being a radical activist in opposition to America, the Constitution, and the people of America.

• Admitting to extensive illegal drug use during his time in college.

• Travelling on a foreign passport available only to citizens of those foreign nations and denying such foreign citizenship.

• The use of aliases, also-known-as names, and false birth certificates.

• The agreement to turn over to the IMF control of American banking and financial institutions.

• The unilateral disarming of American nuclear capabilities leaving America defenseless in an ever increasing nuclear world.

• The abandonement of all plans for a missile defense system leaving America naked to nuclear attack.

• The abandonement of the F-22 project leaving America incapable of air superiority

• The expression that victory is not the primary objective in Afghanistan while increasing the number of US soldiers in that theater

• The admission that he does not know what the health care bill he was rushing through Congress contains.

• The refusal to take command of a piracy and kidnapping episode involving the US Navy and Somali pirates

• The proclaimation that water boarding is torture opening the way for indictment of US soldiers, intelligence officers, former president and vice president, and members of congress by a world/international court for acts against humanity

• Backing and supporting a leftist Marxist would be dictator deposed by an elected republic according to their Constitution, Congress, and Supreme Court.

• Lying to the people regarding his Muslim childhood and education in Islam

• The building of a civilian military force to be loyal to himself to enforce his policies on the people

• Disregard for bankruptcy law by allowing non-preferred stock holders priority in distribution of assets over preferred stock holders and pension plans

• Illegally firing Inspectors General appointed by Congress for performing their appointed duties

• Funneling of billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal organizations under investigation and prosecution for voter registration fraud

• The abandonement of support for long term allies of America such as Israel, and others

• The refusal to enforce US immigration laws

• Failure to secure the national borders

• The providing of billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal immigrants in the form of education, unemployment, healthcare, and retirement benefits

• Ruling by executive order bypassing the seperation and checks and balances of powers mandated by law

• The illegal and frivolous use of taxpayer dollars for personal extravegences

• All actions performed in the execution of the office of president due to his status of usurper for his failure to provide afore mentioned proof of eligibility

• Aiding and abetting the self-proclaimed enemies of the USA giving reason for hope of victory and boosting their morale.

• Transferring dangerous terrorists from a safe, secure facility built specifically for their incarceration, to federal, civilian prisons inside the USA endangering US citizens.

• Attributing to incarcerated enemy terrorists civil rights meant specifically to apply only to US citizens.

• Violating US Federal Code by collecting information on those US citizens who exercise their first ammendment rights to freedom of speech.

• Inciting riot and dissension by labeling sincere citizen grass-roots protests as mob action, manufactured anger, and extremist sponsored.

There are many and assundry factors that have come together to cause the economic recession we are experiencing today. Deficit spending, excessive dependence on credit, governmental irresponsibility, and excessive taxation are typical examples. But there is one underlying, overpowering cause of the collapse of our economy and that is the ever increasing cost and decreasing supply of energy. Energy is essential to every aspect of life in America and is the one dominating factor in the endeavor to raise the standard of living for undeveloped regions of the world. The rise in standard of life and decrease in mortality rate of all humankind is directly proportional to the consumption of energy.

Watch this video, almost 2 hours long.

Re: President Barack H. Obama’s Eligibility To Be Our President

Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President! It is a fact that Obama was born a subject of the British Crown. He openly admits his father is a British Subject at the time of his birth.

Here are several references to the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. I implore you, URGENTLY, to investigate on your own:

Our Nation is at grave risk. This issue MUST be addressed. Citizens across this nation, to include myself, are asking this question: Is Obama qualified to be our President and Commander in Chief. The public protests are beginning.

There is a significant movement and it is spreading like an impassioned grassfire. To assume it will go away is foolhardy. Furthermore, the usurpation of our Constitution threatens the very survival of our Union!

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, and now our loyal service men and woman are in personal jeopardy!

 The survival of our nation is at stake. This issue will not go away.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the United States. As an American Citizen and a retired military Veteran, I implore you to please Issue a Quo Warranto to provide The USA citizenry an answer to this constitutionally vital question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto:

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion - which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as "third persons" and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

For your information, I have also taken the liberty to include the following web sites, which will hopefully provide you with other evidence relating to this issue, that I believe support my concerns.. This evidence was meticulously put together by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo Ca 92691, ph-949-683-5411 fax 949-586-2082 and some were shared with Mr. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, Main 202-514-2000, Attorney General 202-353-1555,http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/ on or about February 27, 2009 and hand delivered to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts on or about March 12, 2009:

Open Letter From Brigadier General Charles Jones: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 4, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/05/open-letter-from-brigadier-general-charles-jone.aspx

Col. Riley-Former Division Chief National Security Agency Joins Our Action: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 23, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/23/col-riley-former-division-chief-national-security-agency-joins-our-action-2.aspx

Major General-Commanding General Carroll D. Childers Joins Military Suit : Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 24, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/24/major-general-commanding-general-carroll-d-childers-joins-military-suit.aspx

Motion to Reconsider Lightfoot V Bowen:Hand Delivered To U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts: Hand Delivered and Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 12, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.org/motiontoreconsiderLightfootvBowen.htm

Dossiers and Getting The Word Out: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/dossiers-and-getting-the-word-out.aspx

Dr. Orly Taitz's Interview By Rollye James: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/orly-taitzs-interview-by-rollye-james.aspx

This is a Chalice Radio Talk Show interview with Mr. Leo Donofrio, which I also took the liberty of sharing with you, as a means of providing you with more background information relating to this issue:

The Chalice Show - Leo Donofrio Live: On March 18, 2009:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/PatriotsHeartNetwork/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/03/19/The-Chalice-Show-Leo-Donofrio-Live

I have also attached a copy of my resume for your review.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this time sensitive and urgent issue.

Disclaimer: Although I share numerous resources with you, as a means of supporting my concerns, it does not necessarily mean that I support and/or agree with the contents of all of them, word-by-word, but find them thought provoking because, they provide me with other views besides my own and, thereby, help me make my case.

As a retired Marine Corps Veteran Officer (Mustang), I pride myself with loving my God, family, friends and my country. Those Military and/or Veteran Comrades, that I am honored to call friends, know that I would never intentionally say or do anything that would hurt or demean anyone, to include my God and Country.

I have always preached to my own family and follow the rule of "filtering everything that comes from my brain through my heart before it comes out of my mouth" and this rule has done me well for almost 62 years of my life and would highly recommend it to anyone that dares to share their own views with others, knowing that they may not have the same views, but are able and willing to accept that and not take it personal.

I also consider the sharing of these concerns to be given me under our "FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS", which I consider as one of the corner stones of our "Constitution’s 1st Amendment," and, as an American Citizen, I believe that it is my "God Given Duty" to stand up for and defend this or any other rights given me under our Constitution, as other God and Country loving Americans in uniform have done in the past and continue to this date.

I seek your immediate response to my grave concern.

See the townhall blog by Capt. Martinez

This is the key to challenging Obama’s eligibility. It answers, specifically, the court’s reasoning for dismissing all other cases.

The US Attorney for D.C., Jeffery Taylor, needs to be convinced that the We the People of America are truly concerned about Obama’s eligibility. If he sees that there is a substantial number of citizens who are truly concerned about the nation’s well being, he might decide to file the suit on our behalf. If he does, it can not be dismissed, it must go to trial.

Let Jeffery Taylor hear from you. Let’s give this one more BIG effort for the sake of our country. This is the procedure I’ve been searching for. This is why all other cases failed.

Dear Mr. Taylor:
As a citizen of the United States of America I have grave concerns for the security and overall well being of our great nation. These concerns arise from the fact that Barack Obama has stated in public and in his autobiography that his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British subject under British law at the time of Barack Jr’s. birth, which precludes Barack Obama from being eligible for the office of president as required.

It is a fact that Obama has openly admitted that his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and that that extended the father’s citizenship to him.

There have been numerous suits filed addressing this, only to be dismissed because of lack of standing. The public has become outraged from being told that they have no right to file a suit, or that the Constitution doesn’t apply anymore. Many protests have taken place and more will.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

Dear Mr. Taylor:
As a citizen of the United States of America I have grave concerns for the security and overall well being of our great nation. These concerns arise from the fact that Barack Obama has stated in public and in his autobiography that his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British subject under British law at the time of Barack Jr’s. birth, which precludes Barack Obama from being eligible for the office of president as required, (Section 1, Article 2 of the US Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States) calling for the President to retain a special status of natural born citizen in order to qualify for eligibility to that office.

I have researched the definition of "Natural Born Citizen" as written in the Federal Papers by Justice John Jay. It defines "Natural Born" as being born of two US citizens who are under no other jurisdiction or allegiance. Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President!

This definition of citizenship has a long history in British Common Law and the framers were very familiar with the concept. In 1677 a law was passed intended to insure that a child born to a British couple would be a British subject, even if born aboard a ship or on foreign territory. This was to be citizenship by blood, not by soil. The framers drew upon this definition to establish a super class of citizen, applicable only to the eligibility for the office of president. They foresaw the possibility that a person NOT born and raised by US citizens, or by only one citizen, might not have the zeal and love for and dedication to this country and would act against the best interests of the People and the nation. Barack Obama has shown that he is a model of what the founders did NOT want to become president.

It is a fact that Obama has openly admitted that his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and that that extended the father’s citizenship to him.

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, questions whther or not he has a Commander in Chief.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you alone are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the People of the United States. As an American citizen and a military veteran, I implore you to please address this Constitutional dilemma and issue and a Quo Warranto and provide the People of the USA a lawful answer to this constitutional question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto:

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion - which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as "third persons" and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

If I can be of any assistance in any way, please do not hesitate to contact me.