Re: President Barack H. Obama’s Eligibility To Be Our President

Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President! It is a fact that Obama was born a subject of the British Crown. He openly admits his father is a British Subject at the time of his birth.

Here are several references to the meaning of Natural Born Citizen. I implore you, URGENTLY, to investigate on your own:

Our Nation is at grave risk. This issue MUST be addressed. Citizens across this nation, to include myself, are asking this question: Is Obama qualified to be our President and Commander in Chief. The public protests are beginning.

There is a significant movement and it is spreading like an impassioned grassfire. To assume it will go away is foolhardy. Furthermore, the usurpation of our Constitution threatens the very survival of our Union!

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, and now our loyal service men and woman are in personal jeopardy!

 The survival of our nation is at stake. This issue will not go away.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the United States. As an American Citizen and a retired military Veteran, I implore you to please Issue a Quo Warranto to provide The USA citizenry an answer to this constitutionally vital question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto:

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion - which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as "third persons" and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

For your information, I have also taken the liberty to include the following web sites, which will hopefully provide you with other evidence relating to this issue, that I believe support my concerns.. This evidence was meticulously put together by Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., 26302 La Paz ste 211, Mission Viejo Ca 92691, ph-949-683-5411 fax 949-586-2082 and some were shared with Mr. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, Main 202-514-2000, Attorney General 202-353-1555,http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/ on or about February 27, 2009 and hand delivered to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts on or about March 12, 2009:

Open Letter From Brigadier General Charles Jones: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 4, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/05/open-letter-from-brigadier-general-charles-jone.aspx

Col. Riley-Former Division Chief National Security Agency Joins Our Action: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 23, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/23/col-riley-former-division-chief-national-security-agency-joins-our-action-2.aspx

Major General-Commanding General Carroll D. Childers Joins Military Suit : Posted By Dr. Taitz-On February 24, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/02/24/major-general-commanding-general-carroll-d-childers-joins-military-suit.aspx

Motion to Reconsider Lightfoot V Bowen:Hand Delivered To U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John J. Roberts: Hand Delivered and Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 12, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.org/motiontoreconsiderLightfootvBowen.htm

Dossiers and Getting The Word Out: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/dossiers-and-getting-the-word-out.aspx

Dr. Orly Taitz's Interview By Rollye James: Posted By Dr. Taitz-On March 19, 2009:

http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/19/orly-taitzs-interview-by-rollye-james.aspx

This is a Chalice Radio Talk Show interview with Mr. Leo Donofrio, which I also took the liberty of sharing with you, as a means of providing you with more background information relating to this issue:

The Chalice Show - Leo Donofrio Live: On March 18, 2009:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/PatriotsHeartNetwork/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/03/19/The-Chalice-Show-Leo-Donofrio-Live

I have also attached a copy of my resume for your review.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this time sensitive and urgent issue.

Disclaimer: Although I share numerous resources with you, as a means of supporting my concerns, it does not necessarily mean that I support and/or agree with the contents of all of them, word-by-word, but find them thought provoking because, they provide me with other views besides my own and, thereby, help me make my case.

As a retired Marine Corps Veteran Officer (Mustang), I pride myself with loving my God, family, friends and my country. Those Military and/or Veteran Comrades, that I am honored to call friends, know that I would never intentionally say or do anything that would hurt or demean anyone, to include my God and Country.

I have always preached to my own family and follow the rule of "filtering everything that comes from my brain through my heart before it comes out of my mouth" and this rule has done me well for almost 62 years of my life and would highly recommend it to anyone that dares to share their own views with others, knowing that they may not have the same views, but are able and willing to accept that and not take it personal.

I also consider the sharing of these concerns to be given me under our "FREEDOM OF SPEECH RIGHTS", which I consider as one of the corner stones of our "Constitution’s 1st Amendment," and, as an American Citizen, I believe that it is my "God Given Duty" to stand up for and defend this or any other rights given me under our Constitution, as other God and Country loving Americans in uniform have done in the past and continue to this date.

I seek your immediate response to my grave concern.

See the townhall blog by Capt. Martinez

This is the key to challenging Obama’s eligibility. It answers, specifically, the court’s reasoning for dismissing all other cases.

The US Attorney for D.C., Jeffery Taylor, needs to be convinced that the We the People of America are truly concerned about Obama’s eligibility. If he sees that there is a substantial number of citizens who are truly concerned about the nation’s well being, he might decide to file the suit on our behalf. If he does, it can not be dismissed, it must go to trial.

Let Jeffery Taylor hear from you. Let’s give this one more BIG effort for the sake of our country. This is the procedure I’ve been searching for. This is why all other cases failed.

Dear Mr. Taylor:
As a citizen of the United States of America I have grave concerns for the security and overall well being of our great nation. These concerns arise from the fact that Barack Obama has stated in public and in his autobiography that his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British subject under British law at the time of Barack Jr’s. birth, which precludes Barack Obama from being eligible for the office of president as required.

It is a fact that Obama has openly admitted that his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and that that extended the father’s citizenship to him.

There have been numerous suits filed addressing this, only to be dismissed because of lack of standing. The public has become outraged from being told that they have no right to file a suit, or that the Constitution doesn’t apply anymore. Many protests have taken place and more will.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

Dear Mr. Taylor:
As a citizen of the United States of America I have grave concerns for the security and overall well being of our great nation. These concerns arise from the fact that Barack Obama has stated in public and in his autobiography that his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British subject under British law at the time of Barack Jr’s. birth, which precludes Barack Obama from being eligible for the office of president as required, (Section 1, Article 2 of the US Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States) calling for the President to retain a special status of natural born citizen in order to qualify for eligibility to that office.

I have researched the definition of "Natural Born Citizen" as written in the Federal Papers by Justice John Jay. It defines "Natural Born" as being born of two US citizens who are under no other jurisdiction or allegiance. Nowhere in history is Natural Born Citizen defined in such a way that would allow a person with divided loyalties to become President!

This definition of citizenship has a long history in British Common Law and the framers were very familiar with the concept. In 1677 a law was passed intended to insure that a child born to a British couple would be a British subject, even if born aboard a ship or on foreign territory. This was to be citizenship by blood, not by soil. The framers drew upon this definition to establish a super class of citizen, applicable only to the eligibility for the office of president. They foresaw the possibility that a person NOT born and raised by US citizens, or by only one citizen, might not have the zeal and love for and dedication to this country and would act against the best interests of the People and the nation. Barack Obama has shown that he is a model of what the founders did NOT want to become president.

It is a fact that Obama has openly admitted that his father was a British subject at the time of his birth, and that that extended the father’s citizenship to him.

Our military is in jeopardy of becoming divided over this issue. With these lawsuits; one solider today, another tomorrow, questions whther or not he has a Commander in Chief.

For whatever political and historical reasons we have come to this dire situation, you alone are the person empowered by Congress to file a Quo Warranto on behalf of the People of the United States. As an American citizen and a military veteran, I implore you to please address this Constitutional dilemma and issue and a Quo Warranto and provide the People of the USA a lawful answer to this constitutional question.

Federal statute (Chapter 35§ 16-3501) for quo warranto was tailor made by the legislature to challenge any person occupying any public office of the United States under questionable title thereto:

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion - which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as "third persons" and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then "interested persons" may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be - according to SCOTUS in Newman - restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, i.e. POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

If I can be of any assistance in any way, please do not hesitate to contact me.

There has been much debate over what constitutes a natural born citizen. Much of the debate has been misinformed calling the concept of natural born an obscure technicality or an overight by the writers of the Constitution. Neither of these characterizations are true.

Many times the true meaning of consitutional wording must be determined by looking at the era and the circumstances, and, in some cases, terminology in other sections of the constitution, the inclusion or exclusion of supporting verbage, and even writings other than the Constitution.

Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible who shall not attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United Satates."

The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be natural born, otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. The writers and delegates, having been born in the US, wanted to be eligible for the presidency, but most were the children of British subjects. Knowing that that eliminated them from being natural born and, thus, from eligibility, they included the grandfather clause which expired when the last person alive at the time of the ratification of the Constitution died. So, being a native born citizen is not the same as being natural born. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.

When asked to define natural born citizen, John Bingham, the author of the 14^th ammendment which extended the bill of rights to former slaves, stated, "Any human born to parents who are US citizens and are under no other jurisdiction or authority." The Naturalization Act of 1790, also passed by this congress, declared "And the children of citizens of the US shall be considered as natural born, provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been a resident of the US." Neither of these definitions, one from US law, mentions birthplace, only the parents' citizenship.

This concept of citizenship by blood as opposed to citizenship by geography is a concept with a long history in British common law. A law passed in 1677 says that natural born citizens are those persons born to British citizens, including those born overseas. Alexander Porter wrote an article over 100 years ago in which he declares that the framers drew upon this difference in the law of heredity and territorial allegiance to define a third class of citizen applicable only to the eligibility to hold the office of president. According to Morse, "the framers thought it wise to provide that the president should at least be the child of citizens owing allegiance only to the US at the time of birth." He goes on to say that the the eligibility of the president "was scarcely intended to bar the children of American citizens, whether born at sea or in foreign territory."

The concept of citizenship by blood also precludes the equation of natural born with native born as the latter strictly demands geographical requirements.

Many argue that Barack Obama was eligible to be a state senator and a US senator and could not suddenly be ineligible to be president, but that is exactly the case. If this premise were true, Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California, would also be eligible to be president, and it is established that he is not.

         a) A native born citizen is anyone born in the US. This includes so called "anchor babies" born to immigrant parents in the US.

         b) A naturalized citizen is someone who has satisfied the requirements of the naturalization process and has sworn allegiance to the US, regardless of where they were born or their parents' citizenship status. This includes the multitudes of people who came to America through Ellis Island and then successfully completed the classes for naturalization and swore an oath of allegiance to America.

Obama is a textbook example of why the founders considered it so important for a president to be natural born. They did not want someone like Obama to become president. Their worries and fears about anyone NOT natural born becoming president are validated by Obama’s lack of allegiance to America, the Constitution, and everything good about America.

How, then, do we go about getting him removed from office?

Glenn Flowers

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 12/30/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of "qualifications" to serve as President of the United States which is pending in the U.S. Supreme Court [Docket No. 08 – 570] with two [2] Conferences scheduled on January 9th and 16th 2009, filed suit against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama on behalf of a Retired Military Colonel.

Berg today, with co-counsel Lawrence J. Joyce, Esquire, filed another lawsuit in Federal Court in the United States District for the District of Columbia on behalf of Retired Colonel Hollister against Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama demanding to know Obama’s real name and if he is constitutionally qualified to be President. Plaintiff, Gregory S. Hollister, is a resident of Colorado Springs, Colorado and Hollister has "standing" and needs a decision so he knows whether or not to follow any Order of Soetoro a/k/a Obama.

The suit is in the nature of an Interpleader that shifts the burden of proof to the Defendants, Soetoro a/k/a Obama and Biden to show that they are "qualified" for office.

Berg stated, "I am determined, on behalf of the 320 million citizens in the United States, to see that "our U.S. Constitution" is followed. Specifically, in the case of Soetoro a/k/a Obama, does he meet the constitutional qualifications for President ? I do not believe so based upon: 1) Obama was born in Kenya and because his mother was not nineteen [19], he was only "naturalized" and therefore, not qualified to be President; 2) Obama was legally adopted/acknowledged in Indonesia at the approximate age of six [6] and attended school as "Barry Soetoro," [his step-father is Lolo Soetoro] for four [4] years – Indonesia did not have dual citizenship and to attend school, he had to be adopted or acknowledged and he became a "natural" citizen of Indonesia; 3) when he returned to Hawaii at age ten [10], there is a question if he returned through U.S. Immigration – (a) if he did, Barry Soetoro would have been given a "Certification of Citizenship" that would have indicated he was a "naturalized" U.S. citizen since he was a "natural" citizen of Indonesia; or (b) if he did not go through immigration, which I believe, then Soetoro a/k/a Obama is an illegal alien and therefore, not constitutionally qualified to be President and his three [3] years as an U.S. Senator were a fraud."

Berg continued, "I am appalled that the main stream media continues to ignore this issue as we are headed to a ‘Constitutional Crisis.’ There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced. I am encouraged that the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled two [2] Conferences to look into the merits of our allegations. I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified ‘natural-born’ citizen and therefore, is ineligible to assume the Office of the President of the United States.

Obama, knows he is not ‘natural born’ as he knows where he was born and he knows he was legally adopted/acknowledged in Indonesia; is an attorney, Harvard Law head of the Law Review and graduate who taught Constitutional law; knows the Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘hoax’ attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; places our Constitution in a ‘crisis’ situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world."

Berg concluded, "I will continue my efforts until Obama either proves he is qualified or does the right thing and states that he is proud that he, an African American, received more votes than anyone else in the Presidential election on November 4, 2008, but because of things in his past, he must withdraw his name."

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005

We all know about the Constitution requiring a person to be a natural born citizen to be president. We also know at least seventeen lawsuits have been filed aiming to prevent Obama from becoming the president because he, allegedly, is not qualified, or to demand that he provide proof he is qualified. And, we are aware that all but one of these suits have been dismissed without considering whether Obama is or is not qualified, but because the courts say the people filing the suits had no legal right to do so. Well, after much study and research, it is my amateur and not so educated opinion that the courts have all been legally and Constutionally correct in their rulings.

Why would I come to that conclusion when so many attorneys are claiming the courts were wrong? Aren’t these courts ignoring our rights as citizens to question the qualifications of someone who wants to be the next leader of America, and the free world? I have come to agree with the courts because they are right and we are wrong.

Consider the following hypothetical situation if you will. A certain state has passed new eminent domain legislation designed to prevent private property being seized under eminent domain when there is no real benefit to the community that would substantiate the need for that seizure. A county supervisor decides to launch a study group to determine the need for a second animal control facility that would require property to be seized. A citizen of a neighboring state has knowledge that proves the existing animal control facility is only being utilized at 50% of its capability. That person files a motion seeking a temporary restraining order against the county official to prevent the seizure of personal property. What should be the order of the court as to a restraining order?

The only decision the court should render is that the filer of the motion lacks standing, and dismiss the motion. Why? First because there is no law preventing the study being undertaken, , and second, the filer is not a citizen of the county in question and is not in a position to be damaged by property seizures.

This hypothetical situation demonstrates the validity and knowledge of applicable law inherent in the sixteen dismissals of suits seeking proof of Obama’s qualifications to become the president. There is no Constitutional requirement that a person be qualified to run for the office of president, only to hold that office and, therefore, no law has been broken by Obama. Because Obama is innocent of violating the Constitution these people filing lawsuits have not been damaged and, therfore, lack standing to file any suits requiring Obama prove his citizenship.

The fact that the only suit not summarily dismissed is the original suit filed by Philip Berg, the first action taken against Obama initiating the fury of subsequent filings, is, in my opinion, a possible clue into the thinking of the courts regarding the need for any future determination of Obama’s qualifications for the presidency.

Berg’s motion was complex, seeking several separate actions by the court for various reasons and allegations to be taken to prevent Obama’s being elected or, if elected, to remove him from office. On the other hand, all dismissed cases were very narrowly defined and offering only a single allegation seeking only to prevent his being elected. I believe that the court might be waiting until Obama has been sworn into office, thereby committing the action Berg alleges is a violation of the Constitution. At that point, the court has jurisdiction to grant Berg’s request for immediate discovery and demand Obama provide proof of his eligibility to do what he has already done, hold the office of the president. If he is unwilling or unable to provide proof of his natural born status, there will be no need for impeachment as he is NOT the president but an impostor, nor will there be any need for a criminal trial to determine his guilt. Non compliance with an order by the court to provide proof of eligibility is all that is required to determine his ineligibility, and Obama would be sentenced for his fraud and violation of the Constitution, both federal felonies.

As I am not an attorney my conclusions are no more than the result of a recreational pursuit akin to a fishing expedition. But, knowing the smell of fish, and having studied Obama since March, 2007, I believe the correlation I’ve made between the two are more than just an imagined whiff of something rotten in Denmark.

Glenn Flowers

I received this via e-mail from sonoran news.com...

 

You must register to become president

By Linda Bentley | November 26, 2008

Kenyan Ambassador indicates Obama was born in Kenya
WASHINGTON, D.C. ? As the maainstream media covers President-elect Barack Hussein Obama’s every cabinet appointment consideration, citizens have been seeking information about Obama that, when uncovered, appears to be one fraud after another.

On Nov. 13, Debbie Schlussel, attorney and political commentator, posted on her website (www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/11/exclusive_did_n.html) a copy of Obama’s Selective Service System Registration form.

Schlussel points out all the peculiarities and inconsistencies in the document that would lead just about anyone to conclude the document is a fraud and that either Obama signed the fraudulent document in 2008, rather than in 1980 as the document portends, or he never registered for the draft, as required by law, and someone else created the after-the-fact forgery.

The DLN (Document Locator Number) at the top of the document shows a ten-digit number: 0897080632.

The first two digits indicate the year the document was created, 2008.

However, on the accompanying printout, there is an 11-digit number shown for the DLN with an 8 as the first number to make it appear the document was created in 1980.

Also, the outer circle of the round date stamp by the USPS is difficult to read other than being able to make out “HI” at the top for Hawaii and “USPO” at the bottom.

The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 changed the Department of the United States Post Office (USPO) to the United States Postal Service (USPS), so there is no reason why, in 1980, ten years later, a USPO round date stamp would be used.

The center portion of the date stamp clearly reads “Jul” “29” “80” stacked on three lines. However, the “80” is off-center; the 8 appears under the 9 in 29. Round date stamps use a four-digit number for the year, which is centered under the month and day.

The requirement for all men born after Dec. 31, 1959, citizens and both legal and illegal aliens, living in the U.S., who are age 18 through 25, to register for the Selective Services is still in effect.

Failure to register is a criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in prison or a fine of not more than $10,000.

Additionally, the United States Attorneys’ Manual, under Section 9-79.400: Failure to Register With the Selective Service System, specifically states, “United States Attorneys may not decline to prosecute violations of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a) involving the failure to register with the Selective Service System?.”
>
Failure for men to register with Selective Services before turning 26, even if not prosecuted, will render them ineligible for student financial aid, U.S. citizenship, federal job training, jobs in the executive branch of the federal government and the U.S. Postal Service.

It would appear then, if Obama never registered for the draft that alone would render him ineligible to serve as President of the United States.

Meanwhile, in Detroit, shortly after the General Election, Mike Clark, host of WRIF Radio’s Mike in the Morning Show, called the Kenyan Embassy to learn the reaction in Kenya to Obama becoming elected President of the United States as he jokingly congratulated Kenya on becoming our 51st state.

Clark’s call was put through to Kenyan Ambassador to the U.S. Peter Ogego, who told Clark Kenya had already declared a public holiday that Thursday in Obama’s honor.

Visit http://my.wrif.com/ mim/?p=916 to listen to the on-air interview.

Approximately 12 minutes and 30 seconds into the interview, Clark's co-host asks Ogega, “President-elect Obama's birthplace over in Kenya, is that going to be a national spot to go visit, where he was born?”

Ogego answers, “It’s, uh, already an attraction. His, his, uh, paternal grandmother is still alive ?"

When Ogego was asked, “But his birthplace, they'lll put up a marker there?” he responded, “It depends on the government; it's already well known.”

Photo: While this campaign poster urges people to register to vote in order to vote for Obama in the Indiana Primary, it appears Obama may have neglected to register for the draft, which would render him ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States, or become a postal worker for that matter.

Copyright © 2008 Sonoran News

His eloquent orations and polished mannerisms seemed to throw a fog over his suspected character flaws passed over as non-existant by the majority of voters and the news media. His ability to falsely assure those spoiled masses that he had their particular interests at heart shielded them from his admitted inward disgust for an America seen as having fallen short of its potential. With phraseology such as "economic justice" and "social equality" his choice of confrontation and deceptive activism was believed to be a patriotic and honest hard look at what America had become and as a path to be followed to the full realization of his vision for improvement.

For his ability to persuade and beguile the weak in thought, for his persistence in applying the lessons learned from Marx and Alinsky to the modern election campaign, for his inherent honoring of self and demands of respect and fair play by his opponent, and for his diplomatic prowess in enlisting the formidable persuasiveness of the broadcasting industry to a belief in his cause, we find it our responsibility to offer Mr. Obama a hearty slap on the back and a whispered, under the breath utterance of a sincere and profane expression of our feeling for him.

Yes, he’s the one. The one who saw, the who knew, and the one who acted in a fashion designed to seize the growing tide of dissention and then rub it raw.

Let’s be perfectly candid when defining and quantifying his life, his career, and the campaign that has brought us to this point in history.

With what could legally be considered a radically subversive life totally committed to the peaceful overthrow of the US government, Obama has lied about the truth and prideful confessions of his own autobiography to the apparent satisfaction of Americans who once thought of themselves as patriotic and freedom loving Americans. With proven ties and alliances to such radicals and criminals as Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Louis Farakhan, Jeremiah Wright, and various political machine thugs of Chicago, Obama sailed by any serious scrutiny from all but his most dedicated opponents, and those were as dust in the wind. With a confession of having used hard drugs regularly in college and seeking out the most controversial organizations on campus to insure that he was not seen as a sell out, the adoring masses gathered at his feet and swooned. There was no possibility of wrong doing in their dazed perception of "The One We Have Been Waiting For".

Barack Obama was uniquely qualified to lead the spineless of America from their comfortable life of pursuing happiness into the tyranny and cruelty of an imposed socialist oligarchy, all the while being praised and adored by those he would lead to ruin. Yes indeed, Mr. Obama has to be given his just rewards for his intellect, for his ability to deceive, for his cunning allure, for his stealthy lethality. He has, in less than 24 months, accomplished what the Soviet Union, in all its might and splendor, failed to acieve in fifty years of devious effort. He has, by himself, brainwashed the mentally vulnerable in American society and the leaders of a major political party to allow him to fundamentally rebuild the American government, economy, and mindset from one of Constitutional rule by law and the ideal of individual liberty, to the tried and failed, oppressive criminalities of narcissistic sociopathy espoused by some of the most brutal and murderous maniacs in human history.

Following in the boot prints of the National Socialist Party of Germany (NAZIS) and the original creator of modern fascism, (Mussolini) Obama is set to impose, with the help of like minded Democratic congressmaen, a destructive and demoralizing set of policies that are fully capable of rendering the sole super power on Earth as weak and vulnerable as any third world anarchy. And this to the delight and cheers of those who were once considered to be among the most blessed and envied people on the planet.

Congratulations are not appropriate. Any claim of admiration or respect is not to be found here. What is offered here to Mr. Obama is the promise of no quarter for him and his cronies from those of us who, with the full blessing and admonition of the supreme law of the land, will dog his life incessantly as long as he pursues his evil vision for our nation. We offer him only our most zealous opposition, violently if required, to his twisted and selfish plans. We have nothing but disdain and contempt for his actions and their vomitous inspirations.

To those Americans who have proven weak of spirit and mind in their lemming like sleep walk to Obama’s beckon call, we offer our most heartfelt sympathy at being fooled by the most foolish of all in that you chose such as they promised above the God inspired and humanly expensive paradise of liberty and opportunity of America. We understand such as you but deny any likeness in ourselves, having escaped and thrown off all dealings with such as you centuries past. We wash our hands of your weak ways and offer no consideration of forgivness for any future change of heart. You have what you begged him to give you, and we can no longer tolerate such a luke warm allegiance.

The battlefield has been cleared of non-combatant waste, and it is our opportunity, no, our purpose to plan and execute a withering counter strike of dedication and confidence in the faith and loyalty of the majority of Americans in their inheritance of the promise of the Constitution We, the Conservative Patriots of America, stand together in the righteous pursuit of American values, and the annihilation of all enemies and traitors from the soil and remembrance of America. So help us God.

Glenn Flowers