About Me

Name: Glenn Flowers
Email: glnnflwrs@verizon.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

THE DEFICRATS AND OUR CHILDREN

I have, for decades, believed our schools were centers for extreme leftist, socialist indoctrination, and that this was primarily the work of the Democratic party in the furtherance of Soviet style despostism. Information coming to light in the past few days tends to bolster my beliefs, and should sound alarms for parents of school aged children.

With the announcement of Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress and schools across the country next Wednesday, the president shows Americans just how much he does not respect parents’ authority or his limited duties as POTUS. This direct broadcast of a presidential address to American schools is unprecedented. Even when past presidents have had a message for the youth of America, it has been left to school officials and parents to decide, after hearing it first, if it was something children should hear, or if it could be presented by parents or teachers. The original content of the "study package" provided by the Whitehouse as an attachment to the speech should give everyone evidence as to the intention of this speech. The Whitehouse has made "revisions" to the study package, but I dare say their purpose will not denied by revisions to a few questions. I believe this speech, supposedly addressing health care reform issues, will include statements directed at children intended to influence their thoughts concerning that debate, ignoring the fact that younger, more easily influenced children should not have such weighty and complex issues forced upon their minds by government.

Another example of the Deficrat’s attempt to use children as tools to advance their extreme, socialist, destructive policies is the
No Child Left Inside Act of 2007, an ammendment to the No Child Left Behind re-authorization bill.

 

The NCLIA states as its purpose…

"Climate changes, depletion of natural resources, air and water problems, and other environmental challenges are pressing and complex issues that threaten human health, economic development, and national security. Finding wide-spread agreement about what specific steps we need to take to solve these problems is difficult. Environmental education will help insure our nation’s children have the knowledge and skills necessary to address these complex issues."

This speaks for itself, and proves my point regarding the intent of the Deficrats to promote their policies using our children as their lobbyists.

While it is too late to try persuading the POTUS against anything described here by me, and is probably not worth keeping children home that day, I believe parents should speak with their younger children before and afterwards regarding the speech and its content to impart their own beliefs on the subject to their children.

It is not too late, though, to act on the issue of the No Child Left Inside Act. As is usual in these types of situations, calls and letters to elected officials, inclusion of this issue in the TEA Party agenda and at townhall meetings, and generally letting your opinions be known, is the very least we are responsible to do.

The flagrant nature of the left’s attempt to force their ideology on the world would be hilarious if it weren’t so damned destructive to America.

Glenn Flowers

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ERIC HOLDER’S TRUE AGENDA REGARDING THE CIA

Attorney General Eric Holder has appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the methods used by the CIA in interrogating prisoners captured in Iraq and determine if the interrogators should be criminally charged and tried for their actions. But it won’t end there because the end result they seek is nothing less than the prosecution of George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, their legal advisors, and the CIA interrogators by an international tribunal in Spain for crimes against humanity.

When Obama was inaugurated, Eric Holder was in Spain acting as an advisory counsel in proceedings before the tribunal. He was contacted by Obama’s advisors and asked if he would be willing to participate in the gathering of evidence against US government officials to be provided to that international tribunal. Holder agreed to the request and returned to the states and was apponted attorney general.

The evidence, documents released by the CIA, is sufficient to acquit all involved in any court or military tribunal held in the US. But due to more restrictive definitions of torture and broader, less defined international criminal laws, those same documents would, most likely, be enough to convict all those involved if used by that tribunal in action against them.

Why does Obama and Holder want Bush administration and CIA officials prosecuted?

  1. It would endear them to the transnationalists with whom they share core beliefs, and
  2. Obama’s extreme leftist supporters were promised this if they helped win the election. You just can’t ignore that kind of sincere, loyal dedication, now can you.
  3. What liberal Deficrat wouldn’t want this to happen to Bushitler and Darth Vader?
 
 
 
Glenn Flowers
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

JUST THE FACTS, MAAM, JUST THE FACTS

Following the advice of a trusted, fellow blogger, I have decided, for at least the near future, to concentrate my critique of the present members of the federal government to the actual stupidity and miscalculations, and consequences of their decisions, and, for at least the near future, forgo any mention of what I believe to be their underlying motives. I do this in an attempt to, possibly, convince those who would otherwise brand or have already branded we Conservatives as conspiracy nutts for offering outrageous motivational theories, that regardless of motivation the outcome is disastrous. Having my best friend, a former devout Conservative and war veteran, tell me he believes none of what I proved to him, I must admit there are those who voted for this inept manchild candidate who won’t ever admit that they could have and should have known what Obama was beforehand. It is just too demeaning.

So, BLOGGERS! Do not attempt this at home, this was performed by an experienced blogger with nothing left to fear!

This new methodology will take the style of a new, separate blog named,

JUST THE FACTS, MAAM

a standard line by Sgt. Joe Friday of original DRAGNET fame (for members of the X and Me generations and those in Rio Linda, CA).

Glenn Flowers

 

PS: I have no dreams of actually changing the minds of any hardcore, leftist Deficrats. I am not insane nor do I have illusions of grandeur. Well, not serious ones, anyway.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

IMPEACH OBAMA BUMPER STICKERS

NEW BUMPER MESSAGES
Click image for full size
Save full size image
 
 
 
 
 
SINGLE
 
 
IMPEACH01.jpg
 
 
 
DOUBLE
 
 
IMPEACH02.jpg
 
 
 
SINGLE
 
 
IMPEACH03.jpg
 
 
 
 
DOUBLE
 
 
IMPEACH04.jpg
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT THE DEFICRATS ARE REALLY UP TO

The true purpose of the health care reform hoax

I’ve started this post at least five times and trashed each one due the frustration of trying to list all the reasons why HR3200 is not reform but is just plain wrong for the American health care industry. Instead of fixing those aspects of the industry that result in high costs and lack of coverage for millions, it totally dismantles everything we have come to depend on that makes our health care the best available. It puts the Secretary of Health and Human Services in place as a health care dictator who will control every aspect of medical care in America. HR3200 will not lower costs, will destroy the private health insurance industry, will dictate what treatment is covered and who is eligible to receive that care, will ration care to reduce costs, will reduce payments to doctors and hospitals, will cost trillions of dollars of taxpayers money (again), and will offer only one source for medical treatment for everyone, that being the government controlled "public option".

Our medical care in America is without equal in the world despite the claims from the left that it ranks 24th worldwide. If you examine the World Health Organization’s statistics that ranking includes cost and percentage of population not eligible, among other non-quality factors that do not have any bearing on actual quality of care. When mortality rate, cure rate, immediacy of care, advanced diagnostics, doctor/patient ratio, and similar quality indications are considered, America ranks number one in the world. We’ve all heard Obama preaching about all the unnecessary tests, surgical procedures, re-admittances, and medications that are being used. We’ve heard him lie about how doctors make decisions to perform unnecessary surgeries just because they are more lucrative. What he is really saying is your doctor will no longer be able to perform the tests he might deem necessary, and that your doctor is a butcher who would sooner amputate limbs than treat a hangnail. In reality, the primary care physicians who diagnose ailments such as infected tonsils are not the surgeons who perform tonsilectomies, making his claims not only false but stupid.

HR3200 will destroy the American standard of care and result in a system similar to Great Britain’s medical system. This is not necessary, but that is what will be forced upon us by Obama and the Deficrats. Their ultimate goal is not the improvement of care nor expanded coverage, but is the seizure and control of not only one-sixth of the annual GDP amounting to roughly four trillion dollars, but control of nearly every part of a person’s life. What they eat, whether or not they use tobacco, the use of safety equipment such as seat belts, helmets, hearing protection, and safety glasses, the design of automobiles, bicycles, motorcycles, aircraft, toys, televisions, telephones, and appliances, all would fall under the realm of possible health hazards and would be regulated by the Deficratic government.

If lower costs, improved quality, and expanded coverage were the true purposes of health care reform efforts, there are much less expensive, less destructive actions that would surely result in attaining those goals. Eliminating the governmental regulations requiring universal coverage for such things as vericose vein treatments, accupuncture, substance abuse rehab, male pattern baldness, PMS, erectile disfunction, and depression, to name just a few, would go miles toward lowering the cost of a policy for those who did not need such care. Also, the fact that insurance is used to pay for almost 75% of all medical care accounts for drastic increases in the cost of care provided. When the cost of services is not subject to the influences of a free competitive market costs rise. If the patient were paying for the services rendered, the ability of the patient to go where it might cost less drives costs down due to competition. If the tax credits given to employers for providing medical insurance were given, instead, to the employees to buy their own health coverage or fund a Health Care Savings Account, an environment of competition would be fostered in the insurance market where virtually none exists today. It is government regulation, just as it was in the housing market collapse, that is the source of most of the health care industry’s ailments. We can see how well the housing market has been repaired. Do we want the same hacks fixing our health care system?

Obama and the Deficrats are not after health care reform. They are elitist socialists who can’t live with America’s greatness and exceptionalism. They see our beloved nation as oppressive and a bane on the rest of the world. It matters not to them that every nation in the world wishes they could be more like America, that Canadians come here when their own "public option" medical system tells them they will have to wait six months for cancer surgery, or that women give birth in parks and alleys in the UK because there are no beds available in hospitals. No, they couldn’t care less about the health care we have available or how much worse others are with the same system they are creating. They want you under their boot heel. They want to de-evolve America down to the level of the rest of the world. After all, if we have it so much better, that must mean we are depriving someone of something better than they have.

It is the basic premise of the individual having freedom to choose what type of life he will pursue that has been responsible for the advancements America alone has accomplished. To destroy this in favor of "social justice" and redistribution of wealth will doom not only America, but the entire world to a future of less instead of more.

No Public Option. No Co-ops. No government influence.

Leave the Health care industry alone.

It is self-healing.

Glenn Flowers

 

POSTSCRIPT: Ever notice that the one thing government does fairly well is destruction and death? It makes for a really decent military, but not an efficient health care system.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OK DEMOCRATS, PROVE YOUR POINT ON HEALTH CARE

TEACH ME HOW THE BILL DOESN’T PULL GRANNY’S PLUG

All the Obama supporters are saying that we need to discuss health care reform in a constructive, bipartisan, cooperative manner. Well, I’m willing to give it a go. I’ve read the bill and believe it allows doctors to "pull the plug on Granny". You folks say it doesn’t. Here is your chance to teach a conservative what you know.

I am open minded, but don’t trust politicians very much. If you don’t tell them what they can’t do, they will do it.
I do, for the most part, trust Americans. So, teach me.

It is these five questions about Sect 1233. ADVANCED CARE PLANNING CONSULTATION. Pages 424-434, that make us conservatives believe in the possibility that Granny could have her plug pulled. Prove to us that this bill doesn’t allow it.

  1. Can you show me where the bill prevents a doctor from issuing and signing an "order for life sustaining treatment" that denies treatment to a patient?
  2. Where in Sect 1233, or anywhere in the bill, does it say that the wishes of the patient, on the order for life sustaining treatment, must be carried out in all cases?
  3. What kind of legal barriers need to be addressed in a state, as mentioned on Page 427 paragraph (ii), sub-paragraph (I), to enable an order for life sustaining treatment?
  4. Why is it that a doctor must sign the order to make it legal, but the patient isn’t required to sign?
  5. What directives are available to the patient in Sect. 1866(f)(3) as mentioned on Page 430 in paragraph (iv)?
  6. Why is the patient limited to those directives in Sect. 1866(f)(3)?
When a patient’s choices for life saving treatment are limited in ways not defined,
When there’s no requirement that the patient’s wishes be followed,
When the patient’s signature isn’t required on the order,
When nothing prohibits a doctor from signing an order preventing life saving treatment,
When state laws have to be changed to allow an order to be put into effect,

Then it is possible that a doctor could be forced, under this bill, to withhold life saving medical care and let a ptient die in order to save money.

There are no state laws in existence anywhere preventing a doctor from saving a patient’s life. There are state laws, though, that prohibit doctors from knowingly allowing a patient to die if they can prevent it. It is my opinion, and nothing in the bill says anything different, that the state laws the bill says need to be overcome are state penal codes for murder.

If anyone can alleviate these fears, I, and many more like myself, would greatly appreciate it.

Glenn Flowers
 
 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FORMER KGB AGENT CONFIRMS MY CLAIMS

American School Children Brainwashed Since 60s

In my posts Indiscriminate Discrimination and I Knew This Was Happening I explain my belief that children in the USA have been brainwashed by their Marxist, radical teachers, for over 25 years. This generation has been indoctrinated into the dogma that says all judgement of any kind is wrong, every person has the right to their own beliefs, and all judgemental decisions are to be excoriated as biased, opinionated, and mean spirited. The former KGB agent in the following interview verifies those assertions and explains the entire policy of the USSR for domination of the USA.
Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB expert on subversion and disinformation, defected to America in 1970. He was interviewed in 1984. What follows is an accurate summary of that interview. You can view the interview HERE.

Yuri Bezmenov
Ideological Subversion, Active Measures, Psychological Warfare: To change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.
It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being demoralization, it takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years? Because this the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy.
In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.
The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion
Stage 1 — Demoralization
The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last twenty-five years, actually it’s over-fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success, most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards.
As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to access true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I showered him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures — even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp — he will refuse to believe it until he receives a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his butt, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.
Stage 2 — Destabilization
The next stage is destabilization. This time the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby doesn’t matter anymore. This time — and it takes only from two to five years to destabilize a nation — what matters is essentials. Economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process would go that fast.
Stage 3 — Crisis
The next stage of course is crisis, it may take only up to six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis, you can see it in Central America now. And after crisis, with a change of power, structure, and economy, you have a so-called period of normalization. It may last indefinitely.
Stage 4 — Normalization
Normalization is a cynical expression, borrowed from Soviet propaganda, when the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 1968, Comrade Brezhnev said, "Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized."
This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis. To promise people all kinds of goodies and a paradise on Earth. To destabilize your economy. To eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a Big Brother government in Washington DC with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of a new generation of Soviet assassins, never mind, he will create false illusions that the situation is under control. The situation is not under control. The situation is disgustingly out of control.
Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system, trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peace time. False. The United States is in a state of war. Undeclared total war against the basic principles and the foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of course, it’s the system — however ridiculous it may sound — the world Communist system, or the world Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not I don’t give a hoot. If you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you.
But you don’t have to be paranoid about it. What actually happens now, that unlike myself, you have literally several years to limp on unless the United States wakes up. The time bomb is ticking, with every second the disaster is coming closer and closer, unlike myself you will have no where to defect to. Unless you want to live in Antarctica with penguins. This is it, this is the last country of freedom and possibility.

End of Transcript

 

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, Brothers Emmanuel, David Axelrod, 34 czars, SEIU, ACORN, and Michelle from Hell Obama, have a firm grip on the necks of Americans and they intend to keep us "normalized" for ever. Most of the money from all the bailouts, stimuli, TARP, etc. has not been used for the purposes they were supposed to. A very large sum has been deposited with the Federal Reserve for "future needs" There are many things these thugs could be indicted for: violation of house rules, of the Constitution, of Federal Code, violating their oaths of office, influence peddling, usurping power, embezzlement, collusion, etc.

Obama can surely be convicted by guilt of association, a valid and proven tactic showing that avions of like plummage congregate. His similar avions include Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Rev.Wright, Bernardine Dohrn, Odinga, and The New Party, a socialist organization. All of these are radical Marxist/Socialist links in Obama’s life, some having helped to launch this errant political career. Davis, a known, avowed Communist mentored Obama as a teenager shaping his social views, and fostered his hate for whites. The rest of the radical associations served to reinforce Davis’s teachings, and the socialist New Party of Chicago launched his political career. If you do not believe associations shape the character and judgment of a person, why do you NOT let your child hang out with the local street gangs and crack heads? All the people listed are linked to each other, they all share the same values, and all have been long term and continuous associations.

Unlike the majority of people on earth, Barack doesn’t seem to have a bunch of friends from his past or relatives he hangs out with. But the list of those we DO know about are deserving of permanently sleeping in the ghoulag or Soledad, maybe even Gitmo or Alcatraz. And he asks us to believe what he says when he has continuously lied, multiple times daily, everyday since February 2008.

The two least meaningful words in the world are,

"Obama says…"

Glenn Flowers

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AN UPDATE FROM THE PATRICK HENRY CAUCUS

An E-Mail update from the Patrick Henry Caucus of State Legislatures



From: "The Patrick Henry Caucus" <The_Patrick_Henry_Caucus@mail.vresp.com>

Subject: Newsletter of The Patrick Henry Caucus, August 2009To: glnnflwrs@verizon.net

PHC.jpg

Official Newsletter of The Patrick Henry Caucus; August 13, 2009

Dear Friend of State’s Rights,

Thank you for your devoted interest in The Patrick Henry Caucus and our mission, and for spreading this important message of state sovereignty to your friends, neighbors and family members. We sincerely appreciate those of you who have taken the time to contact your legislators and inform them of our fight for state’s rights.

CAUCUS UPDATE

We are grateful for your continued patience as we develop this caucus. We are in the process of designing an intricate website to better suit the needs of our growing caucus. When fully operational, the website will have a secure forum area where legislators can discuss ideas in real time with other legislators around the country. It will also have a forum and be a one stop resource for citizens to find information and updates on legislation that is being worked on in their state, along with contact information for their legislators.

MEMBER ACTION ALERT

You have no doubt seen the tragic situation involving certain Chrysler dealers around the country. In Utah we have had dealers who owned their business for over 70 years, just to have their dealership taken and given to someone else. It is absolute theft of property. The Patrick Henry Caucus is working overtime to find a solution. We are close to having a state rights bill that will help these dealers protect themselves of this violation of their rights. Until then, Congress is working on a couple bills that would end the madness without state intervention. PLEASE visit this website to find more: www.hometownautodealers.org, then call your senator and ask them to co-sponsor the auto dealer protection bills!

HELP THE CAUCUS GROW

We are truly like a start-up company, albeit without paid workers. In order to build the website that is needed to benefit our cause, pay for legal and other start-up expenses, and to spread our message across the United States, we are in need of financial donations. We have been able to hold fundraisers in Utah, and many of you have helped through online donations. With our volunteer staff, we have been able to put every single penny towards building the caucus, yet, we stand in great need.

Starting a national organization of this magnitude requires a significant financial sacrifice. If you are willing to help organize a fundraiser in your area, we will send caucus founders, including Representative Carl Wimmer who has been featured three times on The Glenn Beck show, to your state to speak to your state rights supporters. You can request more information about fundraising directly from Representative Wimmer at carlwimmer@thepatrickhenrycaucus.org.

Right now, if you can spare $10, $25, or any other amount to help us in our fight for individual freedom and state’s rights, please do so. If this cause is important to you, Visit our website and donate today!

LEGISLATOR ACTION

Citizens are crying out for leadership to unite and act to preserve individual freedoms. We believe this is best done at the state level.

The time has come to actively engage federal government and reassert rights that were never intended for the federal government to have. Our goals include a coordinated effort in passing legislation, some of which is intended to be challenged in the courts. By working together states will be able to share litigation costs and give a united front to the validity of our claims. The ultimate goal is to have a major court victory, swinging the political pendulum back to its proper place.

It is imperative to unite legislators from across the nation who support the cause of reasserting state sovereignty. Soon our website will allow a secure log in for both citizens and legislators, but as of the moment our website is unable to differentiate. If you are a legislator we ask you to email us with your title, name, contact information, district etc…. Please send email to: thepatrickhenrycaucus@thepatrickhenrycaucus.org.

CAUCUS HAPPENINGS

Here are some recent "in the news" moments:

PHC stands to take on big, bad, federal government, August 5, 2009

Group rallies for state’s rights, August 1st

MESSAGE FROM A PHC LEGISLATOR

Hello friends,

It was a short time ago when The Patrick Henry Caucus was simply an idea. This "idea" has sprouted larger than any of us had ever imagined. We are in almost every state in the nation, and are slowly getting organized. There are so many organizations out there right now fighting for state’s rights, and we think that is great! We are ever grateful for the "awakening" that seems to have taken place around the country. How is The Patrick Henry Caucus different from other organizations? We are the only citizen/legislative state rights coalition in the country. I view us as the legislative branch of the 9/12 and the tea party movements as well as all the other state rights movements out there. While maintaining our autonomy, We work hand in hand with the other groups, to hear citizen’s concerns, and then the "legislative branch" of The Patrick Henry Caucus goes to work implementing the needed changes. It truly is Representative government at its best!

The coming weeks and months hold tremendous opportunity. I will update you all when the new website is launched!

I am often asked, "What if you fail?" I always answer, "We can’t fail. The cost of failure is too high, it’s our freedom."

Yours in liberty,

Rep. Carl Wimmer

Herriman, UT

The Patrick Henry Caucus Website

Sign up with The Patrick Henry Caucus

PHC on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Contact your state legislators

Email: thepatrickhenrycaucus@thepatrickhenrycaucus.org

Forward this message to a friend



 

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe


 

The Patrick Henry Caucus
P.O. Box 1215
American Fork, UT 84003

Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.

http://www.verticalresponse.com/landing/?mm/fa42cd8a8eTry Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!http://www.verticalresponse.com/landing/?mm/fa42cd8a8e

 
 
 
Glenn Flowers
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HAS OBAMA EARNED OUR TRUST?

I have read through the "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009"
I can tell you it is not American, affordable, healthy, or a choice. It is an act.
 
 
 
A List
  • Any proposed legislation will be posted on the internet at least five days before it is voted on so the people can read the bill and give their input.
  • Earmarks, or pork, will be stopped. I will veto any bill with earmarks attached to it.
  • Lobbyists will have no place in my administration or in Washington.
  • All I ever heard from Rev. Wright on Sundays was about God, love, and Jesus Christ.
  • When I met Bill Ayers I knew nothing about his past.
  • I never had any association with ACORN.
  • I knew nothing about Tony Rezko’s illegal acts.
  • I am not a Muslim, I never attended a Muslim school, and I was not raised as a Muslim.
  • I am not a socialist.
  • I do not want to take over automobile companies. I have enough on my plate already.
  • I met Michelle while we were in college.
  • Our stimulus bill will keep the unemployment rate at or below 8%. It will never rise higher than 8%.
  • General Motors is too big and and has too many working Americans to just let it go bankrupt.
  • My administration will be the most open and transparent in history.

All of the above statements should be easily recognizable in two ways. First, they all came out of the pie hole of Barack Obama. Second, they are all lies that he knew were lies when he said them, the worst kind of lie, intentional.

And those are just off the top of my head, I’m sure there have been MANY others I am not aware of.

 So, when Obama stands in front of his beloved teleprompter, telling us about the health care bill, and says…

  • there is no provision for rationed health care in the health care reform bill,
  • you will be able to keep your doctor and insurance plan if you wish,
  • the bill will be revenue neutral,
  • it will not be government controlled, socialized medicine,
  • it will not come between you and your doctor,
  • it will provide coverage for everyone,
  • it will only do away with the waste and fraud,
  • the medical industry is so bad that something HAS to be done, that we can’t just do nothing,
  • the AMA and AARP endorse the bill,
can we, knowing about his blatant dishonesty, trust him in anything he says about the health care reform bill, or anything for that matter?
 

 

New Discovery! (I think)

I believe I’ve discovered another unreported evil in the bill. On page 100, Sect 205(d)(1), Coverage for Certain Newborns, there is a description of how an infant, born with no approved health care, shall be, within 60 days, classified as a non-traditional Medicaid eligible individual. Sounds innocent enough. But on page 749, Section 1943(b)(1), Treatment of Certain Newborns, it says, "In the case of a child who is deemed under Sect. 205(d)(1) of this act to be a non-traditional Medicaid eligible individual and enrolled under this title pursuant to such section, the State shall provide for a determination by not later than the end of the period referred to in subparagraph (A) of such section, of the child’s eligibility for medical assistance under this title."

I read that to mean that the child may/can be denied treatment if the parents do not register the child in this plan BEFORE the child is born. It is coercion to insure parents’ compliance with the plan.
 

Geography of the bill (No map)

Overall, the bill is structured in a manner meant to hide such offensive provisions and be confusing and hard to find anything using the Table of Contents. The TOC has no page numbers, at least not in the PDF I obtained. The TOC is divided into Divisions labeled A, B, C, etc., each of those have several Titles labeled I, II, III, etc., with the numbering being restarted in each division, and each Title has Subtitles labeled A, B, C, etc.

But, the actual layout of the bill is organized by Sections beginning with 100, 101, 102, etc., subsections labeled (a), (b), (c), etc. and sub-subsections labeled (1), (2), (3), etc. Each of these sub-subsections has sub-paragraphs labeled (A), (B), (C), etc.

To reference anything such that someone else can actually find your reference you need to use, Page, Section(subsect)(sub-subsect), Subparagraph, as I did above.

Example: Page 100, Section 205 (d)(1) subparagraph A.

You can not, at least not quickly, find anything by Division, Title, and Subtitle, as these are major, very large delineations. 1018 pages with just three Divisions means thumbing through at least 300 pages to find if you are in the right Division, the one after, or the one before the one you want. And with subtitles and subparagraphs both using capital letters, and every other sub-anything using small letters, trying to find what you want on any page is sleep inducing. Things could have, should have been made simple by incorporating, uhhh, let’s see, hmmmm…. ?PAGE NUMBERS? in the Table of Contents. These guys never fail to amaze with their absolute disdain for the people. And THEY are the stupid ones, not US. I’ll show them disdain.

Anyway, this bill is everything they claim that it’s not, everything they say they don’t want, and is exactly what they say won’t or couldn’t ever pass the Senate. LIARS!!

Glenn Flowers

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A NEW BUMPER MESSAGE FOR CONGRESS


A NEW BUMPER MESSAGE
 
MAYBE PELOSI'S GANG 

WILL UNDERSTAND THIS
 
  GETOUT.jpg
 
CLICK IMAGE TO OPEN FULL SIZE
IN NEW WINDOW
THEN SAVE IMAGE 

 
Lyrics byVassir Bushmills
Graphics by Glenn Flowers
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE FOUNDATION OF ALL LIBERTIES

That Right Which Makes Liberty Possible

Note: The useage of (decision) below denotes a choice made. Duh…

The societies of mankind and their governmental efforts down through history are eternally the subject of much study, teaching, and, fortunately for some, disagreement and debate. It is also, unfortunately for all, the source cause for most of mankind’s mistreatment of his fellow man and the majority of wars fought.

Man’s perceived necessity for war can be reduced to just a single underlying, primary cause, that being greed for power and influence and its opposition by those being oppressed. In any meager study of world history this single factor is easily found to account for more than 95% of all violence of man on man. It is the fight to be free that causes most of the strife between men.

 

That there are those who would dominate others for their own selfish fulfillment is a sad reality that has been forced upon the less poweful..Among rational, critically thinking people the basic, inborn yearning for freedom and self-determination is a valid and moral reason for opposing despotism and tyranny. It is not only accepted as honorable and heroic, but also as the only recourse available.

Why does man find himself violently resistive of being dominated by others? To those accustomed to living freely that question answers itself. To those who have been long oppressed that question need not be asked. It is the right of an individual to make his own choices.

That single, self-evident, inalienable right to determine what is best for one’s self as an individual that is the foundation upon which all other rights, liberties, and freedoms are based. Carried to its most extreme, having no freedom of choice is equal to being imprisoned in solitary confinement, there having no choice at all, and it is certainly not to be free in any way.

It is a very rare situation where the complete elimination of one’s choices is imposed ‘en masse, incarceration being an exception, but it is more likely to be a slow, systematic process in which the individual unwittingly participates in his own subjugation

It is also true that the most options available are found to be held by those living in advanced, relatively wealthy societies. This is not per chance, however. Freedom of choice is, at once, both a motivational driver of individual liberties, and the result of continuing societal development.

Consider:
A small nation with an elected government and rule of law decides (decision)  to investigate the source of the hot water killing the fish in the river that runs through their capitol city. It is important because the dead fish are drawing flies and they smell bad, and the fish population is dwindeling rapidly threatening the livelihood of many residents. The results of the investigation will determine the actions needed. (decision)

It is soon found that the water is heated when it flows through a deep chasm recently opened by a powerful earthquake. The hot water started flowing back into the river when it had filled the deep chasm and, now, there is nothing anyone can do to reverse this act of nature. It doesn’t bode well for the future of the fish either.

One of the town elders believes that if the proper measures are taken (decision) the loss of the fish as a retail food commodity can be mitigated, even to the point of a possible increase in return of over 500%. Carried through, his plan (decision) results in the creation of a piping system that delivers, for a small monthly fee, hot water to several towns and villages in the area. The technology expands through research (decision) and it isn’t long before electricity is wired into every household in the nation (decision) .

When government restricts (decision) or bans the rights of the people to make choices there is no motivation (decision) to develop, resulting in even fewer options available. The decision to consume energy and receive the benefits of that consumption inspires the need to be diligent in that usage, resulting in higher technology and a general growth in wealth, health, capabilities, and even more options. It is a snowballing of better and better lives for more and more people. They acquire freedom from the elements, freedom from polluted water and disease, freedom from insect or snake bites, and freedom from the need to gather wood or animal dung for fuel.

Freedom to choose also allows those who have not benefitted from other nations’ increases in technology to have a real reason to hope that they will, eventually. Where no freedom of choice is allowed, no such hope can be justified. For a government to limit (decision) the chances of a poor nation to develop today to increase their own substantial wealth (decision) some fifty or one-hundred years in the future is inhuman and unethical, and brands those restricting decision making on one’s own behalf as devils among men, worthy of severe and resolute punishment.

When you have no options left, you must simply lay down and die. There is no other choice.

Glenn Flowers
 
 
 
Postscript: Mrs. AL astutely pointed out to me that the term "choice" has been stolen and redefined by Roe v Wade and, after re-reading my post I had to agree that my liberal, uhh, multitudinous usage did tend to bring the new meaning to mind. That is the reason for my changing "(choice)" to "(decision)" in most instances. I did grant pardon to some instances of "choice", though. It only seems right to claim that right to choose "choice" when meaning the right Right. Hehehe...
 
I'm sounding like SmartFella now, huh. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE DUTY TO REBEL

There are many well thought and worded posts here calling for the people to rise up in rebellion to the tyranny we are experiencing and to take back our government. I agree that the present administration is in violation of the Constitution and federal law and is following a road to absolute dictatorial tyranny the kind of which we should not tolerate.
 
That document that grants us the authority to rebel lists what would be necessary to make such a rebellion legal and proper. Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Indepenence,
 
"WE  hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,  Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security."
 
Jefferson states that prudence will guide us not to throw of a government long established for transient causes. But he also says that when a long train of abuses leading to the same goal shows there to be a design for despotism. THEN it is our duty to rebel and reform the government according to our wishes.
 
While it is true that the Constitution has come to mean less and less to our federal officials, we did not ever consider it tyranny until it had actually become such, beginning January 20, 2009. Until the past six months we still held some hope that the election process could be the tool for peaceful. legal authority over the government.
 
Also, if you read on to the end of the Dec of Independence, it is the STATES who declared their independence and it was the STATES that created the Constitution. Therefore, I believe that it is only the STATES who can determine that tyranny has been suffered long enough. For the people to bring arms against the government without the states first acting and failing to abolish that government is illegal under the Constitution. The people must decide when they've been ignored long enough by the feds and give up trying to get them to act and, instead, focus all their anger and dissension at the state legislatures in an effort to convince them to pass state's rights resolutions that list the illegal actions by the feds, and resolve to abolish their contract with them, essetially firing the federal government.
 
A majority of state legislatures passing identical resolutions would be constitutionally legal and, in my opinion, garner the support of the Armed Forces. That will be absolutely necessary.
 
The reason all the law suits against Obama were dismissed because of lack of standing is because the PEOPLE must act throught the States, as they did in creating the USA, to have any authority. Individuals did not create the Constitution and are not covered by it. They lack standing in most relations with the feds.
 
While we've been under this attack for only six months, there is no time to lose.
 
Let's stop pi--ing in the wind by trying to influence federal officials. It is useless.
 
Let's put all our efforts where they will be legally recognized even if they are ignored, toward the State governments. It is the ONLY legal avenue for We the People to assert our authority, peacefully. If that fails, then we will speak of more unpleasant days to come.
 
I have posted a list of websites of all fifty states' governments that have e-mails of all state legislators. It is THESE legislators where we must focus our voices for it is only they that just might listen. We already know the feds won't.
 
E-mail them demanding they unite as they did in 1787, and fire the federal government, resetting the Constitution.
 
Glenn Flowers
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ALL FIFTY STATE GOV'T URLs

Below is a list of the fifty state government web sites and their URLs. Almost all the sites have the E-mail addresses for both Republican and Democrat, Senate and House members.
 
Very handy
 
Glenn
 

Alabama AL www.legislature.state.al.us

Alaska AK w3.legis.state.ak.us

Arizona AZ www.azleg.state.az.us

Arkansas AR www.arkleg.state.ar.us

California CA www.legislature.ca.gov

Colorado CO www.leg.state.co.us

Connecticut CT www.cga.ct.gov

Delaware DE www.legis.state.de.us

Florida FL www.leg.state.fl.us

Georgia GA www.legis.state.ga.us

Hawaii HI www.capitol.hawaii.gov

Idaho ID www.legislature.idaho.gov

Illinois IL www.ilga.gov Indiana

IN www.state.in.us/legislative Iowa

IA www.legis.state.ia.us

Kansas KS www.kslegislature.org

Kentucky KY www.lrc.state.ky.us

Louisiana LA www.legis.state.la.us

Maine ME janus.state.me.us/legis/

Maryland MD mlis.state.md.us

Massachusetts MA www.mass.gov/legis/

Michigan MI www.legislature.mi.gov

Minnesota MN www.leg.state.mn.us

Mississippi MS www.ls.state.ms.us

Missouri MO www.moga.state.mo.us

Montana MT leg.state.mt.us

Nebraska NE www.leg.ne.gov

Nevada NV www.leg.state.nv.us

New Hampshire NH gencourt.state.nh.us

New Jersey NJ www.njleg.state.nj.us

New Mexico NM legis.state.nm.us

New York NY

State Senate: www.senate.state.ny.us

State Assembly: assembly.state.ny.us

North Carolina NC www.ncleg.net

North Dakota ND www.legis.nd.gov

Ohio OH www.legislature.state.oh.us/

Oklahoma OK www.lsb.state.ok.us

Oregon OR www.leg.state.or.us

Pennsylvania PA www.legis.state.pa.us

Rhode Island RI www.rilin.state.ri.us

South Carolina SC www.scstatehouse.net

South Dakota SD legis.state.sd.us

Tennessee TN www.legislature.state.tn.us

Texas TX www.capitol.state.tx.us

Utah UT www.le.state.ut.us

Vermont VT www.leg.state.vt.us

Virginia VA legis.state.va.us

Washington WA www1.leg.wa.gov/legislature

West Virginia WV www.legis.state.wv.us

Wisconsin WI www.legis.state.wi.us

Wyoming WY legisweb.state.wy.us

 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ILLEGAL AND ANTI-AMERICAN ACTIONS BY ADMINISTRATION AND CONGRESS

  • Knowingly and purposefully lying to the American public regarding his true agenda and vision of America, hiding their socialist plans until elected
  • Using fraud and criminal activists to gain an advantage in the 2008 election
  • Acting to cover up fraud and illegal activity by his campaign and ACORN
  • Accepting and seeking illegal foreign and domestic campaign contributions
  • Attacking the policies and platforms of opposing candidates by spreading falsehoods about family and friends to the point of libel and slander.
  • Promoting legislation to silence radio talk show hosts not in step with the administration.
  • Denial of responsibility for adverse and harmful effects of their policies and, instead, falsely blaming them on the opposition and previous administrations
  • The arrogant violation of the Constitution and federal law regarding spending of tax revenues on items not approved
  • Bullying, in thuggish fashion, anyone speaking out or acting against their policies and actions.
  • Congress meeting behind closed doors, locking out minority members.
  • Passing legislation in such a hasty manner as to preclude the reading or debate of same.
  • Confiscation of the future earnings of the people of America for semi-legal purposes, and distributing those funds for other, unproposed purposes
  • The sequestration of a large portion of those funds in secret accounts.
  • The levying on the people of taxes in excess of half of their earnings for the purpose of forcing certain lifestyles and behaviors adverse to their general well being without authority of law.
  • The overtaking of private corporations and industries by governmental decree.
  • The distribution of private, corporate, and public assets and wealth to trade unions, campaign supporters, and friends.
  • Refusal to submit documentation of eligibility for office.
  • Knowingly acting in a manner destructive to the United States and its people and economy by supporting punitive taxation
  • Apologizing to nations of the world for the past actions of America not deserving of an apology.
  • Lying to the people regarding the true effects of his health care reform bill on the care the people will receive, their choice of plans and providers, rationing and elimination of health care to the elderly, and access by the government to citizens’ bank accounts.
  • Actively pursuing policies designed to remake America into a fascist socialism akin to the teaching of Vladamir Lenin and Saul Alinsky.
  • Acting in a racially divisive and biased manner in all incidents succeptible to racial differences and biases.
  • Appointing unelected, unconfirmed "czars" to positions having both legislative and executive powers, constituting a separate and unresponsible, all powerful fourth branch of government.
  • Appointment of believers and supporters of eugenics, forced abortion, transnationalism, global government, junk science, etc. to positions described as czars above.
  • Funding, with tax revenues, self proclaimed, violent enemies of America publicly announcing their intent to overthrow the government of America and institute a system of religious persecution.
  • Acting to train and prepare illegal campaign organizations in methods and tactics of defrauding voter registration activities.
  • Admitting, in his own words, to being a radical activist in opposition to America, the Constitution, and the people of America.
  • Admitting to extensive illegal drug use during his time in college.
  • Travelling on a foreign passport available only to citizens of those foreign nations and denying such foreign citizenship.
  • The use of aliases, also-known-as names, and false birth certificates.
  • The agreement to turn over to the IMF control of American banking and financial institutions.
  • The unilateral disarming of American nuclear capabilities leaving America defenseless in an ever increasing nuclear world.
  • The abandonement of all plans for a missile defense system leaving America naked to nuclear attack.
  • The abandonement of the F-22 project leaving America incapable of air superiority
  • The expression that victory is not the primary objective in Afghanistan while increasing the number of US soldiers in that theater
  • The admission that he does not know what the health care bill he was rushing through Congress contains.
  • The refusal to take command of a piracy and kidnapping episode involving the US Navy and Somali pirates
  • The proclaimation that water boarding is torture opening the way for indictment of US soldiers, intelligence officers, former president and vice president, and members of congress by a world/international court for acts against humanity
  • Backing and supporting a leftist Marxist would be dictator deposed by an elected republic according to their Constitution, Congress, and Supreme Court.
  • Lying to the people regarding his Muslim childhood and education in Islam
  • The building of a civilian military force to be loyal to himself to enforce his policies on the people
  • Disregard for bankruptcy law by allowing non-preferred stock holders priority in distribution of assets over preferred stock holders and pension plans
  • Illegally firing Inspectors General appointed by Congress for performing their appointed duties
  • Funneling of billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal organizations under investigation and prosecution for voter registration fraud
  • The abandonement of support for long term allies of America such as Israel, and others
  • The refusal to enforce US immigration laws
  • Failure to secure the national borders
  • The providing of billions of taxpayer dollars to illegal immigrants in the form of education, unemployment, healthcare, and retirement benefits
  • Ruling by executive order bypassing the seperation and checks and balances of powers mandated by law
  • The illegal and frivolous use of taxpayer dollars for personal extravegences
  • All actions performed in the execution of the office of president due to his status of usurper for his failure to provide afore mentioned proof of eligibility
  • Aiding and abetting the self-proclaimed enemies of the USA giving reason for hope of victory and boosting their morale.
  • Transferring dangerous terrorists from a safe, secure facility built specifically for their incarceration, to federal, civilian prisons inside the USA endangering US citizens.
  • Attributing to incarcerated enemy terrorists civil rights meant specifically to apply only to US citizens.
  • Violating US Federal Code by collecting information on those US citizens who exercise their first ammendment rights to freedom of speech.
  • Inciting riot and dissension by labeling sincere citizen grass-roots protests as mob action, manufactured anger, and extremist sponsored.
 
Glenn Flowers
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

INDISCRIMINATE DISCRIMINATION

Dis crim i nate v, 1. To make a clear distinction; distinguish; differentiate
--American Heritage Dictionary

The word, discriminate, has come to be known as synonomous with racial prejudice or racial bias. While it could mean those in certain contexts, its true definition is far less evil, and is, actually, complimentary when used to describe one’s ability to think and analyze in a critical fashion. Discriminating is the act or description of the act of clearly defining a subject.


While the title of this piece uses both the accepted but incorrectly applied definition and the actual meaning of the word, it does describe the manner in which the liberal lives his life and makes value judgements. This ingrown corruption of thought and lack of a need to define right and wrong is both arbitrary (indiscriminate) and judgemental (discriminatory) according to their own set of values. And what, pray tell, are their values? That making a judgement as to the rightness or wrongness of anything is wrong. They refuse to discriminate in the manner that comes natural to normal, properly educated humans of adult age.


There is a book, the author’s name escapes me, whose title explains the mindset of all liberals, All I Ever Needed To Know I Learned In Kindergarten.
In that formative and pliable period of childhood a great many basic principles are learned and, in most cases, those principles are fleshed out and refined with additional knowledge and years of experience. The liberal mind, though, learns "Don’t hit" and in later years the basic premise of "don’t hit" remains. They never learn that it might be necessary and the correct thing to do to defend one’s self or one’s nation against aggression. They also learn, during that period of childhood, that to judge something or someone as good or evil, right or wrong, is not a good thing to do, as one may have a reason for acting in what might appear to be a wrong way. To judge is wrong, have an open mind to all opinions, do not discriminate. This lesson is primarily the product of elite academians attempting to teach a "better way". It ends up a disaster for the child and the population in which he is to live his life.


Why would anyone seek to instill this mutated outlook on life into the minds of children? Because all the governments and religions, all the kings, emperors, and presidents throughout history have failed to bring about a total end to man’s suffering. No one has ever, through their judgement of right and wrong, attained a utopia. So, what else is there except indiscriminate, non-judgemental beliefs to try instead? So, they discriminate indiscriminately. In other words, they judge without determining the right or wrong, they just oppose any judgement and replace it with their opposition to that judgement.


The vast majority of humans learn early in their lives, without even being taught as much, that there are differences in right and wrong, good and evil, and the natural ability of the human mind to discriminate between the two leads most to the same conclusions as to what is right or good, and what is wrong or evil. Fully 90% of all humans would agree as to the distinguishing characteristics between those opposites. But not the child indoctrinated to be indiscriminate.


In the attempt to never be judgemental they must accept evil as being the same as good and in doing so, they must see any judgement or discrimination as bad. To be labeled as a good thing means that the bad thing had to have been cheated out of its right to be judged on an equal basis. To be a bad thing the good had to have been unjustly determined as good to the detriment of the thing judged as bad. The result of this indiscriminate discrimination is the liberal necessity to always support the opposite of whatever is judged as good or as bad by those self righteous, know it all self worshippers.


In judging the nation of Israel to be a decent, peace and freedom loving nation of tolerant Jews, the liberal sees it his duty to take the opposite approach and find all the fault he can to negate the positive and intelligent judgement of Israel as a good nation. In the patriotism and national pride Americans show for their nation, the liberal’s indiscriminate discrimination demands the defining of all admiration for America to be self serving conceit and arrogance. Whatever a thing is found to be, right or wrong, the liberal must oppose it to maintain their philosophy of equality of being.


The notion that Sadam Hussein was an evil dictator who murdered and tortured his own people leads to a liberal defining him as a strong leader who held his country together despite worldwide condemnation and persecution. Likewise, the belief that the United Nations panders to evil dictators and tyrants and embezzles the contributions of member nations demands a liberal judgement that the UN is the only force fighting for global equality and the dignity of all people.


To keep from being judgemental they, instead, indiscriminately discriminate. You can’t fairly define them as evil because they seek to do good in their misguided ways. They can’t be labeled as stupid either because their personal lives show the ability to work and generally be a productive member of society. So what causes their backwards philosophy of judging good versus evil? Brainwashing. Early childhood indoctrination into a world where no judgement is the right judgement. This being the goal of those whose intention is to subjugate the masses under a boot heel of tyranny. It is the mindset of the Orwellian proletariat. Irrationality is their strategy, the lack of critical thought their goal. It is only success at rendering the masses incapable of such discriminatory thinking that will insure the total domination of them. Besides, it is a lot less complicated to just oppose any semblence of rational judgement. It takes less effort to just see everything and everyone as equal in their essence.


It is a surrender of one’s own individuality that is as debilitating as a frontal lobotomy. To become a walking, talking Chatty Cathy doll is the ultimategoal of the well indoctrinated liberal. "Let the really smart people do all the hard work," is their mantra.


So, while we can feel sympathy for those zombies that comprise the majority of the moderate and democratic population, we can not become like them or let them influence the discriminating minds among us. To do so is, well, all too apparent in our present situation. Obama is the product of indiscriminate discrimination. After all, he is one of them.
 
Glenn Flowers
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive